Recent Developments in Disability Insurance in the United States of America

1931 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-95
Author(s):  
E. B. Whittaker

SynopsisThis Paper is a review of the developments in the issuance of disability benefits in connection with life insurance policies which have taken place in the last ten years in America, since Mr. Hunter's Actuarial Study was written. It does not deal with accident and health insurance issued as a separate contract.Disability benefits have been changed repeatedly to meet the needs of the policyholders, from the original waiver of premium benefit in event of permanent disability to the present liberal form known as the 90-day clause, which provides not only for waiver of premium but a monthly income payable during disability not reducing the face amount of the policy. Any sickness which renders the policyholder unable to work for a period of at least 90 days is considered as total and permanent disability.Some companies have been more progressive than others in liberalising their contracts, and at the present time there is a considerable variety of different forms of disability benefit to be had.Several years ago most of the States or the Union passed laws whereby certain standard provisions were made compulsory for all life insurance policies, and two committees have recently been working on standard provisions for disability benefits. The committees made a report which has been adopted, and commencing with July 1, 1930, most of the States will require standard disability provisions, which will result in a much greater uniformity of contract than at present. The standard provisions are set out in the Paper.The question of premiums and reserves is next taken up, and a brief summary is given of the disability investigations which have taken place in the last ten years. There has been a feeling on the part of the companies that they were losing money on disability, but owing to the frequent changes in the forms of disability benefits issued sufficient time had not elapsed to obtain enough data to calculate reliable rates of disability and of death and recovery among disabled lives. Without these it was, of course, impossible to find whether the premiums charged were adequate and whether the reserves on active and disabled lives were too large or too small.The New York Life Insurance Company made an extensive investigation in 1929, covering over 18,000 claims under policies with the 90-day clause, and the results showed that both the premiums charged and the reserves on active lives, based on Hunter's table, were much too small, whereas the reserves on disabled lives were in excess of the true values.This investigation also showed that the loss on females was very much greater than on males, a fact which has also been brought out in the experience under the British National Health Insurance scheme. The ways in which some of the large companies have attempted to solve the question of granting disability benefits to women are outlined in the Paper.The Paper includes rates of disability and premiums for a unit payable at disability and for an annuity of 1 per annum payable monthly during disability according to various experiences.

1931 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-275
Author(s):  
J. B. Maclean

It is now almost seventy years since Sheppard Homans, then actuary of the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, described in a paper presented to the Institute (J.I.A. Vol. XI, p. 121) a new method of surplus distribution, devised by himself and D. P. Fackler. The new method was one which had been applied by them for the first time in the surplus distribution of the Mutual Life in 1863. That method, known as the Contribution Plan, has since been universally adopted in the United States and Canada and is thus the method of surplus distribution which is and for many years has been applicable to the larger part of the life insurance in force throughout the world. The method was not received with favour by British actuaries nor, except possibly in isolated cases, has it ever been applied in Great Britain. The methods of T. B. Sprague and T. G. C. Browne, while frequently referred to as “contribution” methods, are of a different character from Homans’ method and differ from it radically both in principle and in practical application.


1939 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Hunter

There are so many phases of the problem of blood pressure that I shall limit myself to dealing with a recent investigation of the mortality on lives accepted as “standard risks” by the New York Life Insurance Company.The experience investigated was that of new policies issued from 1925 to 1936, inclusive, observed from entry until the anniversaries of the policies in 1937. The investigation was by policies and was divided into two groups, (a) those in which there was no impairment, and (b) those in which there appeared minor impairments but not of sufficient moment to place the policyholders in a substandard group. The expected deaths were obtained according to the company's standard experience for the same years of issue and exposure. The total number of policies emerging by death was 9552.


1974 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-76
Author(s):  
D. G. Halmstad

In 1935 the New York Insurance Department introduced the concept of special contingency funds for certain types of insurance. Such requirements had first been introduced in 1925 for mutual workmen's compensation companies. Clear, consistent principles for these funds were not stated at the time, but their purpose seems to be to provide a cushion that may be used in time of serious financial difficulty.In group life insurance, this fund is a “special contingency reserve” and is carried at the suggestion of the New York Department). For mutual casualty, nonprofit hospitalization and medical indemnity plans, and for reciprocal insurers, the fund is treated as “special contingent surplus”, and is a mandated substitute for the minimum capital required of stock insurers). The U.S. federal Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 recognizes special credits of a similar nature for health, non-participating life and group life and health insurance coverages.In all of these cases, the accumulations or credits are defined by a designated percentage of premiums). For the New York Department group life reserve and the Income Tax health and group life credit, a maximum is defined by a second percentage of the same annual premiums base. For the nonprofit plans' surplus, a similar maximum in terms of premium is used. However, in the case of mutual casualty companies, and of reciprocal insurers, the “special contingency surplus” must be built up to a defined absolute amount equal to the amount that would be required as capital of a stock company; there are no statutory provisions for withdrawing any part of such a fund once it is accumulated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document