Xinjiang and the Modern Chinese State Justin M. Jacobs Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 2016 xvi + 297 pp. $50.00 ISBN 978-0-29599565-6

2016 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 1122-1123
Author(s):  
Eric T. Schluessel
Author(s):  
Inho Choi

Abstract The study of pre-modern Chinese hegemony is crucial for both theorizing hegemony and envisioning a new global order. I argue the pre-modern Chinese hegemony was a reciprocal rule of virtue, or aretocracy, driven by the transnational sociocultural elites shi. In contrast to the prevailing models of Chinese hegemony, the Early Modern East Asia was not dominated by the unilateral normative influence of the Chinese state. The Chinese and non-Chinese shi as non-statist sociocultural elites co-produced, through their shared civilizational heritage, a hegemonic order in which they had to show excellence in civil virtues to wield legitimate authority. In particular, the Ming and Chosŏn shi developed a tradition of envoy poetry exchanges as a medium for co-constructing Chinese hegemony as aretocracy. The remarkable role of excellent ethos for world order making in Early Modern East Asia compels us to re-imagine how we conduct our global governance.


2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-202
Author(s):  
Susan Mann
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-192
Author(s):  
Niccolò Pianciola
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Catherine Jami

AbstractContrary to astronomy, the early modern Chinese State did not systematically sponsor mathematics. However, early in his reign, the Kangxi Emperor studied this subject with the Jesuit missionaries in charge of the calendar. His first teacher, Ferdinand Verbiest (1623-1688) relied on textbooks based on Christoph Clavius' (1538-1612). Those who succeeded Verbiest as imperial tutors in the 1690s produced lecture notes in Manchu and Chinese. Newly discovered manuscripts show Antoine Thomas (1644-1709) wrote substantial treatises on arithmetic and algebra while teaching those subjects. In 1713, the emperor commissioned a group of scholars and officials to compile a standard survey of mathematics (Shuli jingyun, "Essential principles of mathematics"). This work opened with the claim that mathematics had its roots in Chinese Antiquity. However, it can be shown that the Jesuits' lecture notes were the main source of the Shuli jingyun. The reconstruction of mathematics under Kangxi's patronage is thus best characterised as the imperial appropriation of Western learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document