scholarly journals The two-well problem with surface energy

Author(s):  
Andrew Lorent

Let Ω be a bounded Lipschitz domain in R2, let H be a 2 × 2 diagonal matrix with det(H) = 1. Let ε > 0 and consider the functional over AF ∩ W2,1(Ω), where AF is the class of functions from Ω satisfying affine boundary condition F. It can be shown by convex integration that there exists F ∉ SO(2) ∪ SO(2)H and u ∈ AF with I0(u) = 0. Let 0 < ζ1 < 1 < ζ2 < ∞, .In this paper we begin the study of the asymptotics of mε ≔ infBF∩W2,1Iε for such F. This is one of the simplest minimization problems involving surface energy for which we can hope to see the effects of convex integration solutions. The only known lower bounds are lim infε→0mε/ε = ∞.We link the behaviour of mε to the minimum of I0 over a suitable class of piecewise affine functions. Let {τi} be a triangulation of Ω by triangles of diameter less than h and let denote the class of continuous functions that are piecewise affine on a triangulation {τi}. For the function u ∈ BF let be the interpolant, i.e. the function we obtain by defining ũ⌊τi to be the affine interpolation of u on the corners of τi. We show that if for some small ω > 0 there exists u ∈ BF ∩ W2,1 with then, for h = ε(1+6399ω)/3201, the interpolant satisfies I0(ũ) ≤ h1−cω.Note that it is trivial that , so we reduce the problem of non-trivial (scaling) lower bounds on mε/ε to the problem of non-trivial lower bounds on .

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1340-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Xu ◽  
Ton J. J. van den Boom ◽  
Bart De Schutter ◽  
Xiong-Lin Luo

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 2920-2933 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Comaschi ◽  
B. A. G. Genuit ◽  
A. Oliveri ◽  
W. P. M. H. Heemels ◽  
M. Storace

2004 ◽  
Vol 134 (6) ◽  
pp. 1099-1113
Author(s):  
A. Elfanni ◽  
M. Fuchs

Let Ω ⊂ R2 denote a bounded Lipschitz domain and consider some portion Γ0 of ∂Ω representing the austenite–twinned-martensite interface which is not assumed to be a straight segment. We prove that for an elastic energy density ϖ: R2 → [0 ∞) such that ϖ(0, ±1) = 0. Here, W(Ω) consists of all functions u from the Sobolev class W1, ∞(Ω) such that |uy| = 1 almost everywhere on Ω together with u = 0 on Γ0. We will first show that, for Γ0 having a vertical tangent, one cannot always expect a finite surface energy, i.e. in the above problem, the condition in general cannot be included. This generalizes a result of [12] where Γ0is a vertical straight line. Property (*) is established by constructing some minimizing sequences vanishing on the whole boundary ∂Ω, that is, one can even take Γ0 = ∂Ω. We also show that the existence or non-existence of minimizers depends on the shape of the austenite–twinned-martensite interface Γ0.


Automatica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 109-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Xu ◽  
Ton J.J. van den Boom ◽  
Bart De Schutter ◽  
Shuning Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document