Monitoring of Sensory Evoked Potentials During Surgery of Skull Base Tumours

Author(s):  
F. Gentili ◽  
W.M. Lougheed ◽  
K. Yamashiro ◽  
C. Corrado

ABSTRACT:Despite advances in instrumentation and the use of microsurgical techniques, neurosurgical procedures involving extensive areas of skull base or other critical areas of brain still carry significant risk for neurological injury. The use of intraoperative recording of sensory evoked potentials (SEP) has been advocated to monitor neurologic function during these major neurosurgical procedures to reduce the risk of injury to neural structures.This report summarizes our experience with intraoperative monitoring of SEP in over 200 patients, and details our findings in a group of 12 patients with skull base and posterior fossa tumours. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) were monitored in all patients, and brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) in five. While minor changes in BAEP and SSEP parameters were noted in most patients, significant changes occurred in five. Irreversible loss of BAEP in one patient was associated with complete hearing loss postoperatively. Marked, persistent alteration of both BAEP and SSEP was associated with postoperative brainstem dysfunction. No patient with stable BAEP and SSEP at the end of the procedure suffered additional neurological deficit.We conclude that intraoperative SEP monitoring may be valuable in minimizing neural injury during major neurosurgical procedures.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Vaughan ◽  
Chadron Vassar ◽  
Nitin Kumar ◽  
Kerolos Yousef

Neurophysiologic monitoring is a diverse group of instruments that are used to monitor the central and peripheral nervous system during surgical procedures. Some are used to monitor anesthetic depth, whereas others are used by neurologists to monitor the integrity of the nervous system during surgical procedure. The goal of neurophysiologic monitoring is to have reliable, reproducible, and predictive monitors that can identify impending compromise to the neurologic system (or anesthetic) with minimal false predictive value and high positive predictive value. This allows for the identification of neurologic tissues by location and type that are at risk of compromise by vascular and/or mechanical injury. This review contains 3 figures, 8 tables, and  34 references. Key Words: auditory evoked potentials, bispectral index monitor, electrocorticography, electroencephalography, electromyographic monitoring, M-ENTROPY, motor evoked potentials, narcotrend index, sensory evoked potentials, spectral analysis


Neurosurgery ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 556-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty L. Grundy

Abstract Monitoring of sensory evoked potentials (SEPs) may help minimize the risk of neurological injury during neurosurgical operations. The author describes the current state of the art, summarizing basic principles and reviewing current clinical applications. Experience with intraoperative monitoring of auditory, somatosensory, and visual evoked potentials is presented. The pitfalls and limitations of presently available methods are discussed, with some speculation regarding future developments. Given adequate quality control in the acquisition, processing, and interpretation of electrophysiological signals, monitoring of SEPs can be a valuable adjunct to the intraoperative care of selected neurosurgical patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Polak ◽  
D Weise ◽  
F Metzger ◽  
A Schramm ◽  
AJ Fallgatter ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ryusuke TANAKA ◽  
Atsushi SATO ◽  
Kenji SHINOHARA ◽  
Tohru SHIRATORI ◽  
Chiaki KIUCHI ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. e215-e216
Author(s):  
G. de Scisciolo ◽  
R. Caramelli ◽  
V. Schiavone ◽  
F. Del Corso ◽  
A. Comanducci ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document