Is Consent Necessary for Ethics Consultation?

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-396
Author(s):  
STUART G. FINDER

Is consent necessary prior to the initiation of a specific clinical ethics consultation? This is not a question that has received much attention despite the fact that the issue of consent is one of the earliest considerations associated with bioethics. Perhaps this is because of how clinical ethics consultation, as a formidable clinical practice, came into being. Specifically, although the place and time of its conception is not readily identifiable, it is not unreasonable to say it was born on March 31, 1976, when the New Jersey Supreme Court stated, in its Quinlan decision, that consultation would be necessary with “the hospital ‘Ethics Committee’ or like body of the institution in which Karen is then hospitalized. [And i]f that consultative body agrees that there is no reasonable possibility of Karen's ever emerging from her present comatose condition [then her] life-support system may be withdrawn.”

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Seog Heo ◽  
김범석 ◽  
이진우 ◽  
박혜윤 ◽  
홍진의

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. e0226710
Author(s):  
Ludovica De Panfilis ◽  
Domenico Franco Merlo ◽  
Roberto Satolli ◽  
Marta Perin ◽  
Luca Ghirotto ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-357
Author(s):  
Edward Rudin

Fox, McGee, and Caplan's “Paradigms for Clinical Ethics Consultation Practice”, in the Summer 1998 issue of CQ, evoked memories and an image.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-79
Author(s):  
Aleksandra E. Olszewski ◽  
Maya Scott ◽  
Arika Patneaude ◽  
Elliott M. Weiss ◽  
Aaron Wightman

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 649-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Rasmussen

A major obstacle to broad support of clinical ethics consultation (CEC) is suspicion regarding the nature of the moral expertise it claims to offer. The suspicion seems to be confirmed when the field fails to make its moral expertise explicit. In this vacuum, critics suggest the following:(1)Clinical ethics consultation's legitimacy depends on its ability to offer an expertise in moral matters.(2)Expertise in moral matters is knowledge of a singular moral truth which applies to everyone.(3)The claim that a clinical ethics consultant can offer knowledge of a singular moral truth in virtue of her professional training is absurd, false, or gravely immoral.Therefore,(4)The field is illegitimate.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fariba Asghari ◽  
Alireza Parsapoor ◽  
Khorshid Vaskooi ◽  
Saeedeh Saeedi Tehrani

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNE SLOWTHER

The development of ethics case consultation over the past 30 years, initially in North America and recently in Western Europe, has primarily taken place in the secondary or tertiary healthcare settings. The predominant model for ethics consultation, in some countries overwhelmingly so, is a hospital-based clinical ethics committee. In the United States, accreditation boards suggest the ethics committee model as a way of meeting the ethics component of the accreditation requirement for payment by Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), and in some European countries, there are legislatory requirements or government recommendations for hospitals to have clinical ethics committees. There is no corresponding pressure for primary care services to have ethics committees or ethics consultants to advise clinicians, patients, and families on the difficult ethical decisions that arise in clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document