Physician-Hastened Death and End-of-Life Care: Development of a Community-Wide Consensus Statement and Guidelines

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEVE HEILIG ◽  
ROBERT V. BRODY
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn Bookbinder ◽  
Arthur E. Blank ◽  
Elizabeth Arney ◽  
David Wollner ◽  
Pauline Lesage ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 851-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhir Mishra ◽  
Kanya Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Satish Tiwari ◽  
Rajendra Bangal ◽  
Balraj S. Yadav ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 3021-3027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Heckel ◽  
Stephanie Stiel ◽  
Franziska A. Herbst ◽  
Johanna M. Tiedtke ◽  
Alexander Sturm ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 953-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Truog ◽  
Margaret L. Campbell ◽  
J Randall Curtis ◽  
Curtis E. Haas ◽  
John M. Luce ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nathan Fairman ◽  
Scott A Irwin

This chapter examines how depression may affect a patient’s ability to make life-shortening decisions within the setting of care near the end of life, as well as a clinician’s willingness to support the patient’s preferences (that is, respecting his autonomy). It considers how the suspicion of depression can make the physician pause even when the obvious choice would be to support the patient’s decision. It also describes some of the defining features of depression, including hopelessness, suicidal ideation, and desire for hastened death. The chapter first reviews depression and similar clinical conditions in the context of end-of-life care before discussing the construct of capacity and the elements of its assessment. It then considers evidence on the relationship between depression and decisional capacity before concluding with suggestions to help guide decision-making.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deb Rawlings ◽  
Kim Devery ◽  
Naomi Poole

BackgroundWith over half of expected deaths occurring in acute hospitals, and a workforce not trained to care for them, good quality end-of-life care in these settings is hard to achieve. The National Consensus Statement on Essential Elements for Safe and High-Quality End-of-Life Care has been translated into e-learning modules by the End of Life Essentials project, and this study aims to demonstrate how clinicians interpret the Consensus Statement in their day-to-day practice by answering the question at the end of each module: ‘Tomorrow, the one thing I can change to more appropriately provide end-of-life care is…’MethodsThe modules were developed by a palliative care educator with the support of a peer review group and were piloted with 35 health professionals. Pre-post module evaluation data were collected and during a 10-month period from 2016 to 2017 a total of 5181 individuals registered for the project accessing one or more of the six modules. The data from 3201 free-text responses to the post hoc practice change question have been analysed, and themes generated.FindingsFive themes are derived from the data: communication, emotional insight, professional mindset, person-centred care and professional practice.ConclusionLearners who have completed End of Life Essentials have shared the ways they state they can change their practice tomorrow which may well be appreciated as a clinical response to the work by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care in leading and coordinating national improvements in quality and safety in healthcare in Australia. While intent cannot guarantee practice change, theory on intention—behaviour relations indicate that intentions have a strong association with behaviour. This indicates that the modules have the ability to influence end-of-life care in acute hospitals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document