Discussion 3

2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
pp. 171-174

Dr. Förstl was impressed by Dr. Reisberg's data showing a close relationship between cognitive impairment and behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Yet he questioned Dr. Reisberg's conclusion that cognitive impairment is necessary for developing hallucinations or delusions. Dr. Reisberg responded that although there is no correlation between scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and BPSD, it does not mean that cognition is not involved in these symptoms. By definition, BPSD are behavioral and psychological. There is a psychological, or cognitive, element to all BPSD, said Dr. Reisberg. As an example, he noted that a patient with cataracts is more likely to experience visual hallucinations. A person who is not cognitively impaired will be able to censor those experiences and not discuss them with others. Patients with dementia do not censor this information, and tell others about their visual hallucinations. Dr. Reisberg noted, however, that visual hallucinations among patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are not common, occurring in about 20% of patients, with a peak occurrence just before the final stages of the disease. Dr. Shah commented that BPSD in patients in the final stages of AD may be difficult to detect because techniques for identifying these symptoms in severely cognitively impaired patients are lacking.

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (04) ◽  
pp. 491-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago C. C. Pinto ◽  
Leonardo Machado ◽  
Tatiana M. Bulgacov ◽  
Antônio L. Rodrigues-Júnior ◽  
Maria L. G. Costa ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTObjective:To compare the accuracy of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in tracking mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD).Method:A Systematic review of the PubMed, Bireme, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo databases was conducted. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria and staring with 1,629 articles, 34 articles were selected. The quality of the selected research was evaluated through the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool (QUADAS-2).Result:More than 80% of the articles showed MoCA to be superior to MMSE in discriminating between individuals with mild cognitive impairment and no cognitive impairment. The area under the curve varied from 0.71 to 0.99 for MoCA, and 0.43 to 0.94 for MMSE, when evaluating the ability to discriminate MCI in the cognitively healthy elderly individuals, and 0.87 to 0.99 and 0.67 to 0.99, respectively, when evaluating the detection of AD. The AUC mean value for MoCA was significantly larger compared to the MMSE in discriminating MCI from control [0.883 (CI 95% 0.855-0.912) vs MMSE 0.780 (CI 95% 0.740-0.820) p < 0.001].Conclusion:The screening tool MoCA is superior to MMSE in the identification of MCI, and both tests were found to be accurate in the detection of AD.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 362-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez ◽  
Nadja Smailagic ◽  
Marta Roqué i Figuls ◽  
Agustín Ciapponi ◽  
Erick Sanchez-Perez ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 50-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ales Bartos ◽  
Miloslava Raisova

Background: There is a lack of normative studies of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for comparison with early Alzheimer's disease (AD) according to new diagnostic criteria. Participants and Methods: We administered the MMSE to normal elderly Czechs and to patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia due to AD according to NIA-AA criteria. Results: We established percentile- and standard deviation-based norms for the MMSE from 650 normal seniors (age 69 ± 8 years, education 14 ± 3 years, MMSE score 28 ± 2 points) stratified by education and age. Dementia patients scored significantly lower than the MCI patients and both groups (110 early AD patients) had significantly lower MMSE scores than the normal seniors (22 ± 5 or 25 ± 3 vs. 28 ± 2 points) (p < 0.01). The optimal cutoff was ≤27 points with sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 79% for early detection of AD patients. Conclusion: We provided MMSE norms, several cutoffs, and higher cutoff scores for early AD using recent guidelines.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1732-1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Liberalesso Neri ◽  
Lia Lopes Ongaratto ◽  
Mônica Sanches Yassuda

ABSTRACTBackground: In normal aging, the decrease in the syntactic complexity of written production is usually associated with cognitive deficits. This study was aimed to analyze the quality of older adults' textual production indicated by verbal fluency (number of words) and grammatical complexity (number of ideas) in relation to gender, age, schooling, and cognitive status.Methods: From a probabilistic sample of community-dwelling people aged 65 years and above (n = 900), 577 were selected on basis of their responses to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) sentence writing, which were submitted to content analysis; 323 were excluded as they left the item blank or performed illegible or not meaningful responses. Education adjusted cut-off scores for the MMSE were used to classify the participants as cognitively impaired or unimpaired. Total and subdomain MMSE scores were computed.Results: 40.56% of participants whose answers to the MMSE sentence were excluded from the analyses had cognitive impairment compared to 13.86% among those whose answers were included. The excluded participants were older and less educated. Women and those older than 80 years had the lowest scores in the MMSE. There was no statistically significant relationship between gender, age, schooling, and textual performance. There was a modest but significant correlation between number of words written and the scores in the Language subdomain.Conclusions: Results suggest the strong influence of schooling and age over MMSE sentence performance. Failing to write a sentence may suggest cognitive impairment, yet, instructions for the MMSE sentence, i.e. to produce a simple sentence, may limit its clinical interpretation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Nicolas Darmanthé ◽  
Hossein Tabatabaei-Jafari ◽  
Nicolas Cherbuin ◽  

Background: Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at high risk of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia, but some remain stable. There is a need to identify those at higher risk of progression to improve patient management and outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the trajectory of plasma neurofilament light chain (pNFL) prior to progression from MCI to AD dementia, the performance of pNFL, in combination with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), as a predictor of progression from MCI to AD dementia and to inform clinicians on the use of pNFL as a predictive biomarker. Methods: Participants (n = 440) with MCI and longitudinal follow-up (mean = 4.2 years) from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative dataset were included. pNFL as a marker for neurodegeneration and the MMSE as a cognitive measure were investigated as simple/practical predictors of progression. The risk of progressing from MCI to AD dementia associated with pNFL and MMSE scores was assessed using Cox and logistic regression models. Results: The current risk of progression to AD dementia was 37%higher in individuals with high pNFL (>  56 ng/L) compared to those with average pNFL (≤40 ng/L). A combination of baseline pNFL and MMSE could differentiate those who progressed within 5 years (AUC = 0.75) from stable individuals. Including change in MMSE over 6-12 months further improved the model (AUC = 0.84). Conclusion: Our findings reveal that combining pNFL with a simple dementia screener (MMSE) can reliably predict whether a person with MCI is likely to progress to AD dementia within 5 years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document