Caregiver factors contributing to psychological elder abuse behavior in long-term care facilities: a structural equation model approach

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. 314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-Jy Wang ◽  
Mei-Feng Lin ◽  
Hung-Fu Tseng ◽  
Wen-Yun Chang
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 388-388
Author(s):  
Robert Blancato

Abstract This session will provide updates on how the pandemic led to horrific situations in long-term care facilities and how the pandemic influenced major federal efforts to address elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S664-S664
Author(s):  
B. Saguem ◽  
B. Saoussen ◽  
B.H.A. Béchir

IntroductionElderly who live in settings other than their own homes or those of relatives have received little attention from researchers in Tunisia.AimsTo compare sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with elder abuse between community-dwelling elders and those residing in nursing home.MethodsA comparative study was conducted, including 50 subjects aged 65 years and older living in the community and 20 age- and sex-matched subjects living in a nursing home. Cognitive status, depressive symptoms and autonomy were assessed using mini-mental state examination (MMSE), geriatric depression scale (GDS) and activities of daily living scale (ADL). Elder abuse was evaluated with Indicators of Abuse Screen (IOA).ResultsElder abuse was more prevalent in elderly residing in nursing home (P = 0.009) with a prevalence of 35% and 8% and a mean IOA score of 12.75 and 7.74. Psychological, physical, financial abuse and neglect were reported by elderly residing in nursing home. Those living in community reported exclusively psychological abuse. The victim's reactions were passive in all cases.Elders living in nursing home were more single or divorced (0.000) and financially independent (0.003). They had lower scores of MMSE (0.002) and ADL (0.014), and higher scores of GDS (0.022). A binary logistic regression confirmed that elder abuse was significantly more prevalent in nursing home after eliminating these confounding variables: age, gender, MMSE, GDS and ADL scores (P = 0.018).ConclusionOur results confirm that elderly who live in long-term care facilities are at particular risk for abuse and neglect.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 530-546
Author(s):  
Carmen Touza ◽  
Carmen Prado

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1027-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
MIRI COHEN ◽  
SARAH HALEVY-LEVIN ◽  
RONI GAGIN ◽  
DANA PRILTUZKY ◽  
GIDEON FRIEDMAN

ABSTRACTThe aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of abuse among the residents of long-term care facilities in Israel, and its associations with risk indicators. Seventy-one such residents aged 70 or more years were assessed in the internal and orthopaedic departments of two university medical centres for possible abuse by carers at the long-term facilities from which they were admitted. The study collected socio-demographic and health profiles and a list of maltreatment or abusive acts, and administered the Signs of Abuse Inventory and the Expanded Indicators of Abuse Questionnaire. Among the 71 residents, 31 per cent reported some form of maltreatment, most being instances of disrespectful behaviour. Signs of abuse, mostly of neglect, were detected in 22.5 per cent of the sample. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that higher scores on risk indicators and higher dependence on others for the activities of daily living significantly associated with reported abuse, while age, gender, risk indicators and lower blood albumin level (being an indicator of worse nutritional and health status) significantly associated with identified signs of abuse. It is concluded that direct questioning mainly discloses instances of disrespectful behaviours and humiliation, while the assessment of signs of abuse is more sensitive to cases of neglect. Risk indicators were found to be reliable indicators of abuse. Routine screening for these indicators is recommended to improve detection and thereby to prevent abuse in long-term care facilities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 388-388
Author(s):  
Lori Smetanka

Abstract This session will provide updates on how the pandemic led to horrific situations in long-term care facilities and how the pandemic influenced major federal efforts to address elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-248
Author(s):  
Min Jae Lee ◽  
Sujin Shin

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare facility workers’ and family caregivers’ perceptions toward closed-circuit television (CCTV) in long-term care facilities.Methods: The participants included 70 family caregivers and 66 facility workers in nine long-term care facilities. A structured questionnaire gathered participants’ perceptions of CCTV in long-term care facilities. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, chi-squared test, and Fisher’s exact test with SPSS 26.0.Results: Family caregivers positively perceived both the function (p<.001) and compulsory installation (p<.001) of CCTV in long-term care facilities compared to facility workers. Also, family caregivers highly perceived the necessity of two improvement plans for CCTV application: “the agreement on a video-data-application plan” (p=.032), and “the necessity of a video-analytics expert” (p=.001) compared to facility workers.Conclusion: Family caregivers were more likely to recognize the importance of CCTV in long-term care facilities than facility workers. Further education on the necessity of CCTV, its positive functions, and various usage methods is required considering that the discussion on CCTV installation in long-term care facilities will become more prevalent. In addition, the legal regulations related to CCTV installation should be prepared in detail. Furthermore, it is necessary to understand that CCTV is not a solution to elder abuse, and long-term care facilities should consider future uses of AI-CCTV.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document