Intracranial aneurysm and coarctation of the aorta: prevalence in the current era

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Lauren Andrade ◽  
Arvind Hoskoppal ◽  
Mary Hunt Martin ◽  
Kevin Whitehead ◽  
Zhining Ou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: A 10% prevalence of intracranial aneurysms in patients with coarctation of the aorta has been described in a few studies. Our objective is to describe the rate of intracranial aneurysm detection in patients with coarctation of the aorta in the current era. We hypothesise that, with earlier detection and coarctation of the aorta intervention, the rate of intracranial aneurysm is lower than previously reported and screening imaging may only be warranted in older patients or patients with certain risk factors. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 102 patients aged 13 years and older with coarctation who underwent brain computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or magnetic resonance angiography between January, 2000 and February, 2018. Results: The median age of coarctation repair was 4.4 months (2 days–47 years) and the initial repair was primarily surgical (90.2%). There were 11 former smokers, 4 current smokers, and 13 patients with ongoing hypertension. Imaging modalities included computed tomography angiography (13.7%), MRI (41.2%), and magnetic resonance angiography (46.1%), performed at a median age of 33.3 years, 22.4 years, and 25 years, respectively. There were 42 studies performed for screening, 48 studies performed for neurologic symptoms, and 12 studies performed for both screening and symptoms. There were no intracranial aneurysms detected in this study. Conclusions: These results suggest that the rate of intracranial aneurysms may be lower than previously reported and larger studies should explore the risk of intracranial aneurysms in coarctation of the aorta in the current era.

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (20) ◽  
pp. e10771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodan Chen ◽  
Yun Liu ◽  
Huazhang Tong ◽  
Yonghai Dong ◽  
Dongyang Ma ◽  
...  

Ultrasound ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasileios Rafailidis ◽  
Ioannis Chryssogonidis ◽  
Thomas Tegos ◽  
Sasan Partovi ◽  
Afroditi Charitanti-Kouridou ◽  
...  

Introduction The term “carotidynia” has been used to describe a symptom or a nosologic entity characterized by pain in the lateral neck region and over the carotid bifurcation. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging and the introduction of diagnostic criteria have led to the adoption of term “Transient perivascular inflammation of the carotid artery” (TIPIC) syndrome. Method A retrospective analysis of the Radiology Department’s database was performed to identify cases with the diagnosis of TIPIC syndrome. The purpose was to identify ultrasound images including B-mode technique, colour, power Doppler technique and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Findings In total, five patients with the diagnosis of TIPIC syndrome are presented in this review. TIPIC syndrome is a clinic-radiologic entity characterized by pain over the carotid area, a symptom referring to a wide differential diagnosis where imaging plays a crucial role for proper diagnosis and treatment. Characteristic imaging findings on conventional ultrasound and CEUS are presented in this review. Discussion TIPIC syndrome can be investigated with virtually any imaging modality. Ultrasound typically reveals perivascular infiltration and a hypoechoic intimal plaque, while no significant luminal narrowing is appreciated. Computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography also demonstrate these vascular wall changes primarily affecting the distal common carotid artery, the carotid bulb and possibly the internal carotid artery proximal part. Contrast enhancement is a very characteristic and constant finding of TIPIC lesions, suggestive of the inflammatory nature of the disease and can be appreciated on computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. CEUS has been recently used and successfully observed contrast enhancement of the lesions, similar to computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. Conclusion Ultrasound remains the first-line modality for the evaluation of TIPIC syndrome, capable of providing all the information needed, especially if supplemented with the administration of microbubbles so that the enhancement of lesions can be evaluated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document