Utility of an abbreviated version of the executive and social cognition battery in the detection of executive deficits in early behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
EZEQUIEL GLEICHGERRCHT ◽  
TERESA TORRALVA ◽  
MARÍA ROCA ◽  
FACUNDO MANES

AbstractThe detection of executive deficits in early behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is crucial, as impairments in the executive domain constitute an important diagnostic feature of the newly proposed diagnostic criteria for bvFTD. Our group has recently demonstrated that classical executive tests fail to detect the executive deficits of a subgroup of early bvFTD patients. When administered an executive and social cognition battery (ESCB) that includes tasks that mimic everyday scenarios (e.g., affective decision-making, planning and organization, theory of mind), however, the performance of those bvFTD patients differed significantly from that of controls. One limitation of the ESCB is its lengthy nature (approximately 90 min). For this reason, the present study analyzes the usefulness of alternative shorter versions of this battery. We propose one particular two-task combination that demands approximately 30 min for its administration and scoring, and which presents similar discriminatory accuracy as that of the complete ESCB, while maintaining its significantly superior capacity to detect subtle executive deficits in bvFTD patients relative to classical executive tests. We suggest that, in clinical settings where tools, time, or human resources are scarce, this abbreviated ESCB may be useful in the detection of subtle yet impairing executive impairments of patients with bvFTD. (JINS, 2010,16, 687–694.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gayathri Cheran ◽  
Liwen Wu ◽  
Seonjoo Lee ◽  
Masood Manoochehri ◽  
Sarah Cines ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectives: The cognitive indicators of preclinical behavioral variant Frontotemporal Dementia (bvFTD) have not been identified. To investigate these indicators, we compared cross-sectional performance on a range of cognitive measures in 12 carriers of pathogenic MAPT mutations not meeting diagnostic criteria for bvFTD (i.e., preclinical) versus 32 demographically-matched familial non-carriers (n = 44). Studying preclinical carriers offers a rare glimpse into emergent disease, environmentally and genetically contextualized through comparison to familial controls. Methods: Evaluating personnel blinded to carrier status administered a standardized neuropsychological battery assessing attention, speed, executive function, language, memory, spatial ability, and social cognition. Results from mixed effect modeling were corrected for multiplicity of comparison by the false discovery rate method, and results were considered significant at p < .05. To control for potential interfamilial variation arising from enrollment of six families, family was treated as a random effect, while carrier status, age, gender, and education were treated as fixed effects. Results: Group differences were detected in 17 of 31 cognitive scores and spanned all domains except spatial ability. As hypothesized, carriers performed worse on specific measures of executive function, and social cognition, but also on measures of attention, speed, semantic processing, and memory storage and retrieval. Conclusions: Most notably, group differences arose on measures of memory storage, challenging long-standing ideas about the absence of amnestic features on neuropsychological testing in early bvFTD. Current findings provide important and clinically relevant information about specific measures that may be sensitive to early bvFTD, and advance understanding of neurocognitive changes that occur early in the disease. (JINS, 2019, 25, 184–194)


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Bertoux ◽  
Florian Cova ◽  
Mathias Pessiglione ◽  
Ming Hsu ◽  
Bruno Dubois ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (7S_Part_14) ◽  
pp. P716-P717
Author(s):  
Mario Amore Cecchini ◽  
Monica Sanches Yassuda ◽  
Valeria S. Bahia ◽  
Thais Bento Lima-Silva ◽  
Luciana Cassimiro ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 834-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine L. Possin ◽  
Serana K. Chester ◽  
Victor Laluz ◽  
Alan Bostrom ◽  
Howard J. Rosen ◽  
...  

AbstractOn tests of design fluency, an examinee draws as many different designs as possible in a specified time limit while avoiding repetition. The neuroanatomical substrates and diagnostic group differences of design fluency repetition errors and total correct scores were examined in 110 individuals diagnosed with dementia, 53 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 37 neurologically healthy controls. The errors correlated significantly with volumes in the right and left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), the right and left superior frontal gyrus, the right inferior frontal gyrus, and the right striatum, but did not correlate with volumes in any parietal or temporal lobe regions. Regression analyses indicated that the lateral OFC may be particularly crucial for preventing these errors, even after excluding patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from the analysis. Total correct correlated more diffusely with volumes in the right and left frontal and parietal cortex, the right temporal cortex, and the right striatum and thalamus. Patients diagnosed with bvFTD made significantly more repetition errors than patients diagnosed with MCI, Alzheimer's disease, semantic dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, or corticobasal syndrome. In contrast, total correct design scores did not differentiate the dementia patients. These results highlight the frontal-anatomic specificity of design fluency repetitions. In addition, the results indicate that the propensity to make these errors supports the diagnosis of bvFTD. (JINS, 2012, 18, 1–11)


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 817-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Inácio Mariano ◽  
Paulo Caramelli ◽  
Henrique Cerqueira Guimarães ◽  
Leandro Boson Gambogi ◽  
Millena Vieira Brandão Moura ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1065-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Bertoux ◽  
Leonardo Cruz de Souza ◽  
Claire O’Callaghan ◽  
Andrea Greve ◽  
Marie Sarazin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document