scholarly journals The singular ideal and radicals

Author(s):  
Miguel Ferrero ◽  
Edmund R. Puczyłowski
Keyword(s):  

AbstractSome properties of the singular ideal are established. In particular its behaviour when passing to one-sided ideals is studied. Obtained results are applied to study some radicals related to the singular ideal. In particular a radical S such that for every ring R, S(R) and R/S(R) are close to being a singular ring and a non-singular ring, respectively, is constructed.

2017 ◽  
Vol 165 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES EAST
Keyword(s):  

AbstractWe give new, short proofs of the presentations for the partition monoid and its singular ideal originally given in the author's 2011 papers inJournal of AlgebraandInternational Journal of Algebra and Computation.


1972 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. R. McMorris

It is a well known result (see [4, p. 108]) that if R is a ring and Q(R) its maximal right quotient ring, then Q(R) is (von Neumann) regular if and only if every large right ideal of R is dense. This condition is equivalent to saying that the singular ideal of R is zero. In this note we show that the condition loses its magic in the theory of semigroups.


1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-442
Author(s):  
D. Fieldhouse

One very interesting and important problem in ring theory is the determination of the position of the singular ideal of a ring with respect to the various radicals (Jacobson, prime, Wedderburn, etc.) of the ring. A summary of the known results can be found in Faith [3, p. 47 ff.] and Lambek [5, p. 102 ff.]. Here we use a new technique to obtain extensions of these results as well as some new ones.Throughout we adopt the Bourbaki [2] conventions for rings and modules: all rings have 1, all modules are unital, and all ring homomorphisms preserve the 1.


1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurgen Rompke

A well-known theorem which goes back to R. E. Johnson [4], asserts that if R is a ring then Q(R), its maximal ring of quotients is regular (in the sense of v. Neumann) if and only if the singular ideal of R vanishes. In the theory of semigroups a natural question is therefore the following: Do there exist properties which characterize those semigroups whose maximal semigroups of quotients are regular? Partial answers to this question have been given in [3], [7] and [8]. In this paper we completely solve the commutative case, i.e. we give necessary and sufficient conditions for a commutative semigroup S in order that Q(S), the maximal semigroup of quotients, is regular. These conditions reflect very closely the property of being semiprime, which in the theory of commutative rings characterizes those rings which have a regular ring of quotients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 605-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
PINAR AYDOĞDU ◽  
NOYAN ER ◽  
NİL ORHAN ERTAŞ

AbstractDedekind domains, Artinian serial rings and right uniserial rings share the following property: Every cyclic right module is a direct sum of uniform modules. We first prove the following improvement of the well-known Osofsky-Smith theorem: A cyclic module with every cyclic subfactor a direct sum of extending modules has finite Goldie dimension. So, rings with the above-mentioned property are precisely rings of the title. Furthermore, a ring R is right q.f.d. (cyclics with finite Goldie dimension) if proper cyclic (≇ RR) right R-modules are direct sums of extending modules. R is right serial with all prime ideals maximal and ∩n ∈ ℕJn = Jm for some m ∈ ℕ if cyclic right R-modules are direct sums of quasi-injective modules. A right non-singular ring with the latter property is right Artinian. Thus, hereditary Artinian serial rings are precisely one-sided non-singular rings whose right and left cyclic modules are direct sums of quasi-injectives.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 119-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
TSIU-KWEN LEE ◽  
YIQIANG ZHOU

Let M and N be two modules over a ring R. The concern is about the four substructures of hom R(M, N): the Jacobson radical J[M, N], the singular ideal Δ[M, N], the co-singular ideal ∇[M, N] and the total Tot [M, N]. One natural question is to characterize when the total is equal to one or more of the other structures. We review some known results and prove several new results towards this question and, as consequences, give answers to some related questions.


1973 ◽  
Vol s2-6 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Chatters
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Burinskii

The 4D Kerr geometry displays many wonderful relations with quantum world and, in particular, with superstring theory. The lightlike structure of fields near the Kerr singular ring is similar to the structure of Sen solution for a closed heterotic string. Another string, open and complex, appears in the complex representation of the Kerr geometry initiated by Newman. Combination of these strings forms a membrane source of the Kerr geometry which is parallel to the structure of M-theory. In this paper we give one more evidence of this relationship, emergence of the Calabi-Yau twofold (K3 surface) in twistorial structure of the Kerr geometry as a consequence of the Kerr theorem. Finally, we indicate that the Kerr stringy system may correspond to a complex embedding of the criticalN=2superstring.


1971 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasily C. Cateforis ◽  
Francis L. Sandomierski

In this paper we generalize to modules of singular submodule zero over a ring of singular ideal zero some of the results, which are well known for torsion-free modules over a commutative integral domain, e.g. [2, Chapter VII, p. 127], or over a ring, which possesses a classical right quotient ring, e.g. [13, § 5].Let R be an associative ring with 1 and let M be a unitary right R-module, the latter fact denoted by MR. A submodule NR of MR is large in MR (MR is an essential extension of NR) if NR intersects non-trivially every non-zero submodule of MR; the notation NR ⊆′ MR is used for the statement “NR is large in MR” The singular submodule of MR, denoted Z(MR), is then defined to be the set {m ∈ M| r(m) ⊆’ RR}, where


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document