scholarly journals On the orders of conjugacy classes in group algebras of p-groups

2004 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bovdi ◽  
L. G. Kovács ◽  
S. Mihovski

AbstractLet p be a prime, a field of pn elements, and G a finite p-group. It is shown here that if G has a quotient whose commutator subgroup is of order p and whose centre has index pk, then the group of normalized units in the group algebra has a conjugacy class of pnk elements. This was first proved by A. Bovdi and C. Polcino Milies for the case k = 2; their argument is now generalized and simplified. It remains an intriguing question whether the cardinality of the smallest noncentral conjugacy class can always be recognized from this test.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-328
Author(s):  
VICTOR BOVDI

AbstractA p-group is called powerful if every commutator is a product of pth powers when p is odd and a product of fourth powers when p=2. In the group algebra of a group G of p-power order over a finite field of characteristic p, the group of normalized units is always a p-group. We prove that it is never powerful except, of course, when G is abelian.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Bovdi ◽  
J. B. Srivastava

Let K be a field of positive characteristic p and KG the group algebra of a group G. It is known that if KG is Lie nilpotent, then its upper (or lower) Lie nilpotency index is at most |G′| + 1, where |G′| is the order of the commutator subgroup. The class of groups G for which these indices are maximal or almost maximal has already been determined. Here we determine G for which upper (or lower) Lie nilpotency index is the next highest possible.


1979 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeo Koshitani

Let K be an arbitrary field with characteristic p > 0, G a finite group of order pag′ with (p, g′) = 1, P a p-Sylow subgroup of G and G′ the commutator subgroup of G. For a ring R denote by J(R) the Jacobson radical of R and by Z(R) the centre of R. We write KG for the group algebra of G over K.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-322
Author(s):  
O. Tout ◽  

We consider the wreath product of two symmetric groups as a group of blocks permutations and we study its conjugacy classes. We give a polynomiality property for the structure coefficients of the center of the wreath product of symmetric group algebras. This allows us to recover an old result of Farahat and Higman about the polynomiality of the structure coefficients of the center of the symmetric group algebra and to generalize our recent result about the polynomiality property of the structure coefficients of the center of the hyperoctahedral group algebra.


2020 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. BOVDI

We present a complete list of groups $G$ and fields $F$ for which: (i) the group of normalized units $V(FG)$ of the group algebra $FG$ is locally nilpotent; (ii) the set of nontrivial nilpotent elements of $FG$ is finite and nonempty, and $V(FG)$ is an Engel group.


2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
COSTANTINO DELIZIA ◽  
PAVEL SHUMYATSKY ◽  
ANTONIO TORTORA

Let $w$ be a group-word. For a group $G$, let $G_{w}$ denote the set of all $w$-values in $G$ and let $w(G)$ denote the verbal subgroup of $G$ corresponding to $w$. The group $G$ is an $FC(w)$-group if the set of conjugates $x^{G_{w}}$ is finite for all $x\in G$. It is known that if $w$ is a concise word, then $G$ is an $FC(w)$-group if and only if $w(G)$ is $FC$-embedded in $G$, that is, the conjugacy class $x^{w(G)}$ is finite for all $x\in G$. There are examples showing that this is no longer true if $w$ is not concise. In the present paper, for an arbitrary word $w$, we show that if $G$ is an $FC(w)$-group, then the commutator subgroup $w(G)^{\prime }$ is $FC$-embedded in $G$. We also establish the analogous result for $BFC(w)$-groups, that is, groups in which the sets $x^{G_{w}}$ are boundedly finite.


2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bovdi

AbstractLet F be a field of characteristic p and G a group containing at least one element of order p. It is proved that the group of units of the group algebra FG is a bounded Engel group if and only if FG is a bounded Engel algebra, and that this is the case if and only if G is nilpotent and has a normal subgroup H such that both the factor group G/H and the commutator subgroup H′ are finite p–groups.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050036
Author(s):  
Morteza Baniasad Azad ◽  
Behrooz Khosravi

In this paper, we prove that the direct product [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] are distinct numbers, is uniquely determined by its complex group algebra. Particularly, we show that the direct product [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text]’s are distinct odd prime numbers, is uniquely determined by its order and three irreducible character degrees.


Author(s):  
SH. RAHIMI ◽  
Z. AKHLAGHI

Abstract Given a finite group G with a normal subgroup N, the simple graph $\Gamma _{\textit {G}}( \textit {N} )$ is a graph whose vertices are of the form $|x^G|$ , where $x\in {N\setminus {Z(G)}}$ and $x^G$ is the G-conjugacy class of N containing the element x. Two vertices $|x^G|$ and $|y^G|$ are adjacent if they are not coprime. We prove that, if $\Gamma _G(N)$ is a connected incomplete regular graph, then $N= P \times {A}$ where P is a p-group, for some prime p, $A\leq {Z(G)}$ and $\textbf {Z}(N)\not = N\cap \textbf {Z}(G)$ .


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (08) ◽  
pp. 1650150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongdi Huang ◽  
Yuanlin Li ◽  
Gaohua Tang

A ring with involution ∗ is called ∗-clean if each of its elements is the sum of a unit and a projection (∗-invariant idempotent). In this paper, we consider the group algebras of the dihedral groups [Formula: see text], and the generalized quaternion groups [Formula: see text] with standard involution ∗. For the non-semisimple group algebra case, we characterize the ∗-cleanness of [Formula: see text] with a prime [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is a commutative local ring. For the semisimple group algebra case, we investigate when [Formula: see text] is ∗-clean, where [Formula: see text] is the field of rational numbers [Formula: see text] or a finite field [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document