Application of Spline Collocation Method in Analysis of Beam and Continuous Beam

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lai-Yun Wu ◽  
Yang-Tzung Chen

ABSTRACTIn this paper, spline collocation method (SCM) is successfully extended to solve the generalized problems of beam structures. The spline functions in SCM are re-formulated by finite difference method in a systematical way that is easily understood by engineers. The manipulation of SCM is further simplified by the introduction of quintic table so that the matrix-vector governing equation can be easily formulated to solve the weighting coefficients. SCM is first examined by the problems of a generalized single-span beam undergoing various types of loadings and boundary conditions, and it is then extended to the problems of continuous beam with multiple spans. By comparing with available analytical results, differential quadrature method (DQM), if any, excellent accuracy in deflection is achieved.

2018 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Dhiman ◽  
Mohammad Tamsir

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a new method, namely, “Re-modified quintic B-spline collocation method” to solve the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky (KS) type equations. In this method, re-modified quintic B-spline functions and the Crank–Nicolson formulation is used for space and time integration, respectively. Five examples are considered to test out the efficiency and accuracy of the method. The main objective is to develop a method which gives more accurate results and reduces the computational cost so that the authors require less memory storage. Design/methodology/approach A new collocation technique is developed to solve the KS type equations. In this technique, quintic B-spline basis functions are re-modified and used to integrate the space derivatives while time derivative is discretized by using Crank–Nicolson formulation. The discretization yields systems of linear equations, which are solved by using Gauss elimination method with partial pivoting. Findings Five examples are considered to test out the efficiency and accuracy of the method. Finally, the present study summarizes the following outcomes: first, the computational cost of the proposed method is the less than quintic B-spline collocation method. Second, the present method produces better results than those obtained by Lattice Boltzmann method (Lai and Ma, 2009), quintic B-spline collocation method (Mittal and Arora, 2010), quintic B-spline differential quadrature method (DQM) (Mittal and Dahiya, 2017), extended modified cubic B-spline DQM (Tamsir et al., 2016) and modified cubic B-splines collocation method (Mittal and Jain, 2012). Originality/value The method presented in this paper is new to best of the authors’ knowledge. This work is the original work of authors and the manuscript is not submitted anywhere else for publication.


2005 ◽  
Vol 333 (9) ◽  
pp. 726-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronny Widjaja ◽  
Andrew Ooi ◽  
Li Chen ◽  
Richard Manasseh

Filomat ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 853-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozlem Ersoy ◽  
Idiris Dag

In this study the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky (KS) equation has been solved using the collocation method, based on the exponential cubic B-spline approximation together with the Crank Nicolson. KS equation is fully integrated into a linearized algebraic equations. The results of the proposed method are compared with both numerical and analytical results by studying two text problems. It is found that the simulating results are in good agreement with both exact and existing numerical solutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document