scholarly journals Well-meaning discourses of climate delay

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Stern
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Transformational Change ◽  
Incremental Change

Non-technical summary Lamb et al. (2020) identified 12 discourses used by a counter-movement to delay or weaken action to limit climate change. This commentary notes three discourses used by those promoting such action that can also delay meaningful action: insisting on transformational change to the exclusion of incremental change, downplaying the value of emissions targets, and focusing attention on adaptation.

scholarly journals Introduction - Multi-stakeholder forums and the promise of more equitable and sustainable land and resource use: perspectives from Brazil, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Peru

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
J.P. Sarmiento Barletti ◽  
A.M. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Comparative Research ◽  
Transformational Change ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Address Climate Change ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Current Context ◽  
Multi Stakeholder ◽  
International Forestry

Multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) have become a popular mechanism in global development and conservation circles, given the urgency to find transformative approaches to address climate change and unsustainable development. In this current context, it is important to take stock of MSFs, an example of a participatory mechanism that is emerging as a new 'solution'. The papers in this Special Issue of the International Forestry Review derive from a multi-country comparative research project carried out by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) that aimed to understand how best to support MSFs organised for more sustainable land and resource use. The seven papers assess the potential of MSFs for more equitable decision-making in regard to land and resource use sustainability, and engage with scholarly debates over these forms of participation. The papers approach MSFs from different theoretical perspectives and analytical interests, yet all engage with issues that stem from the power inequalities that are inherent to these forums. The papers provide more evidence – and a warning – that to get closer to transformational change, we need MSFs that do more than simply bring people to the table.

scholarly journals Evaluating Transformational Adaptation in Smallholder Farming: Insights from an Evidence Review

2022 ◽  
pp. 187-202
Author(s):  
Laura Silici ◽  
Jerry Knox ◽  
Andy Rowe ◽  
Suppiramaniam Nanthikesan
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Transformational Change ◽  
Smallholder Farming ◽  
Human Environment ◽  
Learning Domains ◽  
Evidence Review ◽  
International Fund ◽  
Transformative Adaptation ◽  
Over Time

AbstractThe literature on smallholder farming and climate change adaptation (CCA) has predominantly investigated the barriers to and determinants of farmer uptake of adaptation interventions. Although useful, this evidence fails to highlight the changes or persistence of adaptation responses over time. Studies usually adopt a narrow focus on incremental actions that provide limited insights into transformative adaptation pathways and how fundamental shifts in policy can address the root causes of vulnerability across different sectors and dimensions. Drawing on an evidence synthesis commissioned by the International Fund for Agricultural Development’s Independent Office of Evaluation, this chapter outlines how lessons from CCA interventions can be transferred via three learning domains that are essential for transformational change: scaling-up (in its multiple forms), knowledge management, and the human-environment nexus. We discuss the implications of our findings on monitoring, evaluation, and learning, highlighting the challenges that evaluators may face in capturing (a) the persistence or durability of transformational pathways, (b) the complexity of “super-wicked” problems, and (c) the relevance of context-dependent dynamics, within a landscape setting. We also address the contribution of evidence reviews to contemporary debates around development policy linked to climate change and agriculture, and the implications and value of such reviews to provide independent scientific rigor and robustness to conventional programmatic evaluations.

scholarly journals Transformational Change for People and the Planet: Evaluating Environment and Development – Introduction

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Juha I. Uitto
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Transformational Change ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
The State ◽  
Mitigation And Adaptation ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
The World ◽  
Development Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Approaches ◽  
Change Mitigation

AbstractThe world is facing multiple crises as manifested in runaway climate change, a global pandemic, loss of ecosystems and biological species, and rapidly growing inequality. These are all closely interlinked as recognized in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Addressing them will require broad transformational change that encompasses the economy, institutions, and how we interact with the natural environment. This chapter introduces the book that is intended to highlight how evaluation can contribute to such transformations. The chapter first reviews the state of development evaluation. It then briefly introduces the state of the global environment before discussing the implications of this context for evaluation, and how evaluation as a profession and practice must change in order to respond to the challenges of sustainability. The chapter ends by explaining the flow of the book in its four parts that focus on: transformational change, drivers of sustainability, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and evaluation approaches.

Analysis of External Climate Finance Access and Implementation: CIF, FCPF, GCF and GEF Projects and Programs by the Inter-American Development Bank

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofía Viguri ◽  
Sandra López Tovar ◽  
Mariel Juárez Olvera ◽  
Gloria Visconti
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Transformational Change ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Climate Finance ◽  
Low Carbon ◽  
Global Environment Facility ◽  
Climate Action ◽  
External Sources ◽  
Resilient Infrastructure

In response to the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the IDB Group Board of Governors endorsed the target of increasing climate-related financing in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) from 15% in 2015 to 30% of the IDB Groups combined total approvals by 2020. Currently, the IDB Group is on track to meet this commitment, as in 2018, it financed nearly US$5 billion in climate-change-related activities benefiting LAC, which accounted for 27% of total IDB Groups annual approvals. In 2019, the overall volume and proportion of climate finance in new IDBG approvals have increased to 29%. As the IDB continues to strive towards this goal by using its funds to ramp-up climate action, it also acknowledges that tackling climate change is an objective shared with the rest of the international community. For the past ten years, strategic partnerships have been forged with external sources of finance that are also looking to invest in low-carbon and climate-resilient development. Doing this has contributed to the Banks objective of mobilizing additional resources for climate action while also strengthening its position as a leading partner to accelerate climate innovation in many fields. From climate-smart technologies and resilient infrastructure to institutional reform and financial mechanisms, IDB's use of external sources of finance is helping countries in LAC advance toward meeting their international climate change commitments. This report collects a series of insights and lessons learned by the IDB in the preparation and implementation of projects with climate finance from four external sources: the Climate Investment Funds (CIF), the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and the Global Environment Facility (GEF). It includes a systematic revision of their design and their progress on delivery, an assessment of broader impacts (scale-up, replication, and contributions to transformational change/paradigm shift), and a set of recommendations to optimize the access and use of these funds in future rounds of climate investment. The insights and lessons learned collected in this publication can inform the design of short and medium-term actions that support “green recovery” through the mobilization of investments that promote decarbonization.

scholarly journals Can scenario planning catalyse transformational change? Evaluating a climate change policy case study in Mali

Futures ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 44-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmond Totin ◽  
James R. Butler ◽  
Amadou Sidibé ◽  
Samuel Partey ◽  
Philip K. Thornton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Climate Change Policy ◽  
Transformational Change ◽  
Scenario Planning ◽  
Change Policy

scholarly journals Climate Decision-Making

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 271-303
Author(s):  
Ben Orlove ◽  
Rachael Shwom ◽  
Ezra Markowitz ◽  
So-Min Cheong
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Transformational Change ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Climate Action ◽  
The Face ◽  
Deliberative Processes ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Climate Crisis

Climate change decision-making has emerged in recent decades as an area of research and practice, expanding on an earlier focus on climate policy. Defined as the study of decisions relevant for climate change, it draws on developments in decision science, particularly advances in the study of cognitive and deliberative processes in individuals and organizations. The effects of climate, economic, social, and other framings on decision-making have been studied, often showing that nonclimate frames can be as effective as, or more effective than, climate frames in promoting decision-making and action. The concept of urgency, linked to the ideas of climate crisis and climate emergency, has taken on importance in recent years. Research on climate decision-making has influenced numerous areas of climate action, including nudges and other behavioral interventions, corporate social responsibility, and Indigenous decision-making. Areas of transformational change, such as strategic retreat in the face of sea-level rise, are emerging.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document