New Approach to Alternating Thickened–Unthickened Gas Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (43) ◽  
pp. 14637-14647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasser M. Al Hinai ◽  
A. Saeedi ◽  
Colin D. Wood ◽  
Matthew Myers ◽  
R. Valdez ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Changhong Gao

Capture of emulsion droplets in porous media can be costly or beneficial. When produced water is injected into reservoir for pressure maintenance, the oil droplets in produced water can plug reservoir rocks and cause the well to lose injectivity. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology takes advantage of this feature and plugs high-injectivity zones with emulsions. Previous studies reveal that interception and straining are the mechanisms of permeability decline. Established models rely on filtration data to determine key parameters. In this work, a network model is proposed to simulate capture of oil droplets in reservoir rocks and resultant permeability reduction. The model is validated with test data and reasonably good results are obtained. The simulation also reveals that the wettability of the tested porous media was altered by injection of emulsions. The new approach considers the characteristics of the porous media and incorporates the damage mechanisms, thus providing more scientific insights into the flow and capture of droplets in porous media.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Tjokorde Walmiki Samadhi ◽  
Utjok W.R. Siagian ◽  
Angga P Budiono

The technical feasibility of using flare gas in the miscible gas flooding enhanced oil recovery (MGF-EOR) is evaluated by comparing the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) obtained using flare gas to the MMP obtained in the conventional CO2 flooding. The MMP is estimated by the multiple mixing cell calculation method with the Peng-Robinson equation of state using a binary nC5H12-nC16H34 mixture at a 43%:57% molar ratio as a model oil. At a temperature of 323.15 K, the MMP in CO2 injection is estimated at 9.78 MPa. The MMP obtained when a flare gas consisting of CH4 and C2H6 at a molar ratio of 91%:9% is used as the injection gas is predicted to be 3.66 times higher than the CO2 injection case. The complete gas-oil miscibility in CO2 injection occurs via the vaporizing gas drive mechanism, while flare gas injection shifts the miscibility development mechanism to the combined vaporizing / condensing gas drive. Impact of variations in the composition of the flare gas on MMP needs to be further explored to confirm the feasibility of flare gas injection in MGF-EOR processes. Keywords: flare gas, MMP, miscible gas flooding, EORAbstrakKonsep penggunaan flare gas untuk proses enhanced oil recovery dengan injeksi gas terlarut (miscible gas flooding enhanced oil recovery atau MGF-EOR) digagaskan untuk mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca dari fasilitas produksi migas, dengan sekaligus meningkatkan produksi minyak. Kelayakan teknis injeksi flare gas dievaluasi dengan memperbandingkan tekanan pelarutan minimum (minimum miscibility pressure atau MMP) untuk injeksi flare gas dengan MMP pada proses MGF-EOR konvensional menggunakan injeksi CO2. MMP diperkirakan melalui komputasi dengan metode sel pencampur majemuk dengan persamaan keadaan Peng-Robinson, pada campuran biner nC5H12-nC16H34 dengan nisbah molar 43%:57% sebagai model minyak. Pada temperatur 323.15 K, estimasi MMP yang diperoleh dengan injeksi CO2 adalah 9.78 MPa. Nilai MMP yang diperkirakan pada injeksi flare gas yang berupa campuran CH4-C2H6 pada nisbah molar 91%:9% sangat tinggi, yakni sebesar 3.66 kali nilai yang diperoleh pada kasus injeksi CO2. Pelarutan sempurna gas-minyak dalam injeksi CO2 terbentuk melalui mekanisme dorongan gas menguap (vaporizing gas drive), sementara pelarutan pada injeksi flare gas terbentuk melaui mekanisme kombinasi dorongan gas menguap dan mengembun (vaporizing/condensing gas drive). Pengaruh variasi komposisi flare gas terhadap MMP perlu dikaji lebih lanjut untuk menjajaki kelayakan injeksi flare gas dalam proses MGF-EOR.Kata kunci: flare gas, MMP, miscible gas flooding, EOR


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Gajbhiye

Abstract Nitrogen and Carbon dioxide are the most common gases utilized in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques. Most of the gas injection process suffers from the gravity override and viscous fingering resulting in lower oil recovery. Foam is introduced in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) to mitigate these problems encountered during gas flooding. When it comes to the CO2-gas injection the CO2-becomes supercritical at a typical reservoir condition giving it difficulty to form CO2-foam at reservoir condition. The CO2-foam has a common problem to become weaker above its supercritical conditions of 1100 psi and 31°C. As a result, the advantages of using CO2 foam are diminished due to the weakness of CO2-foam at supercritical conditions and results in a lower recovery. However, CO2-foam can be generated by replacing a portion of CO2 with N2 gas. It lacks the understating of mixture properties and its effect on EOR. This study evaluates the performance of CO2/N2 foam at supercritical conditions for EOR. It aims to improve recovery under supercritical conditions by using N2/CO2 mixture foam and optimize the foam quality and CO2/N2 ratio. The results from the experiments showed that the CO2/N2 foam flooding recovered an additional oil of Original Initial Oil in Place (OIIP) indicating that foam flooding succeeded in producing more oil than pure CO2-foam injection processes. Also, the results of foam flooding at different foam quality and CO2/N2 ratio significantly affected the performance and recovery of the process. Hence it is necessary to optimize the CO2/N2 foam parameters flooding process which is affected by the parameters such as foam quality and CO2/N2 ratio. The study also shows an experimental approach for optimizing CO2/N2 foam parameters. The concept of adding N2 to CO2 is a novel way of generating CO2 foam at supercritical conditions. Although investigators are trying different ways to generate the strong and stable CO2- foam, adding N2 to CO2 can be considered to be the easiest way for foam generation as CO2 is always having some impurities in the form of other gases and N2 can be considered as one of such gas helps in generating the foam.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Richard Barnes ◽  
Henk Dirkzwager ◽  
Sheila Dubey ◽  
Carmen Reznik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document