Contribution of amino acid residue 208 in the hydrophobic binding site to the catalytic mechanism of human glutathione transferase A1-1

Biochemistry ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 33 (39) ◽  
pp. 11717-11723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikael Widersten ◽  
Robert Bjoernestedt ◽  
Bengt Mannervik
1999 ◽  
Vol 265 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrice Jacques ◽  
Philippe Perret ◽  
Marie-Jeanne Bouchet ◽  
Bernard Foucaud ◽  
Maurice Goeldner ◽  
...  

Biochemistry ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (25) ◽  
pp. 7414-7419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas H. Graversen ◽  
Bent W. Sigurskjold ◽  
Hans C. Thøgersen ◽  
Michael Etzerodt

FEBS Letters ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teruo Harano ◽  
Keiko Harano ◽  
Susumu Shibata ◽  
Satoshi Ueda ◽  
Hiroo Mori ◽  
...  

The active site of an enzyme performs the twofold function of binding a substrate and catalysing a reaction. The efficiency of these actions determines the overall activity of the enzyme towards the particular substrate, i.e. determines the specificity of the enzyme. It is therefore possible to obtain information on the active site by the kinetics of the enzyme’s reactions with different substrates and inhibitors. An important feature of the active site is its size. It should be possible to 'measure’ this by using substrates or inhibitors large enough to show up the interactions of the furthermost parts of the binding site. In the present series of investigations on proteolytic enzymes, our approach is to compare the activity of the enzyme towards ( a ) peptides of increasing length, ( b ) diastereoisomeric pairs of peptides in which a particular amino acid residue has been replaced by its antipode, and ( c ) pairs of substrates in which a particular side chain (say a methyl group) has been replaced by another (say an aromatic group). The influence of these changes on reaction rates as a function of distance from the point of cleavage indicates the extent of the active site (Schechter, Abramowitz & Berger 1965; Abramowitz, Schechter & Berger 1967).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuy Minh Nguyen ◽  
Masaru Goto ◽  
Shohei Noda ◽  
Minenosuke Matsutani ◽  
Yuki Hodoya ◽  
...  

Gluconobacter sp. CHM43 oxidizes mannitol to fructose and then does fructose to 5-keto-D-fructose (5KF) in the periplasmic space. Since NADPH-dependent 5KF reductase was found in the soluble fraction of Gluconobacter spp., 5KF might be transported into the cytoplasm and metabolized. Here we identified the GLF_2050 gene as the kfr gene encoding 5KF reductase (KFR). A mutant strain devoid of the kfr gene showed lower KFR activity and no 5KF consumption. The crystal structure revealed that KFR is similar to NADP + -dependent shikimate dehydrogenase (SDH), which catalyzes the reversible NADP + -dependent oxidation of shikimate to 3-dehydroshikimate. We found that several amino acid residues in the putative substrate-binding site of KFR were different from those of SDH. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that only a subclass in the SDH family containing KFR conserved such a unique substrate-binding site. We constructed KFR derivatives with amino acid substitutions, including replacement of Asn21 in the substrate-binding site with Ser that is found in SDH. The KFR-N21S derivative showed a strong increase in the K M value for 5KF, but a higher shikimate oxidation activity than wild-type KFR, suggesting that Asn21 is important for 5KF binding. In addition, the conserved catalytic dyad Lys72 and Asp108 were individually substituted for Asn. The K72N and D108N derivatives showed only negligible activities without a dramatic change in the K M value for 5KF, suggesting a similar catalytic mechanism to that of SDH. Taken together, we suggest that KFR is a new member of the SDH family. Importance A limited number of species of acetic acid bacteria, such as Gluconobacter sp. strain CHM43, produce 5-ketofructose at a high yield, a potential low calorie sweetener. Here we show that an NADPH-dependent 5-ketofructose reductase (KFR) is involved in 5-ketofructose degradation and we characterize this enzyme with respect to its structure, phylogeny, and function. The crystal structure of KFR was similar to that of shikimate dehydrogenase, which is functionally crucial in the shikimate pathway in bacteria and plants. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that KFR is positioned in a small sub-group of the shikimate dehydrogenase family. Catalytically important amino acid residues were also conserved and their relevance was experimentally validated. Thus, we propose KFR as a new member of shikimate dehydrogenase family.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document