Thermostable alanine racemase from Bacillus stearothermophilus: DNA and protein sequence determination and secondary structure prediction

Biochemistry ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1311-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Tanizawa ◽  
Atsushi Ohshima ◽  
Alfred Scheidegger ◽  
Kenji Inagaki ◽  
Hidehiko Tanaka ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Roma Chandra

Protein structure prediction is one of the important goals in the area of bioinformatics and biotechnology. Prediction methods include structure prediction of both secondary and tertiary structures of protein. Protein secondary structure prediction infers knowledge related to presence of helixes, sheets and coils in a polypeptide chain whereas protein tertiary structure prediction infers knowledge related to three dimensional structures of proteins. Protein secondary structures represent the possible motifs or regular expressions represented as patterns that are predicted from primary protein sequence in the form of alpha helix, betastr and and coils. The secondary structure prediction is useful as it infers information related to the structure and function of unknown protein sequence. There are various secondary structure prediction methods used to predict about helixes, sheets and coils. Based on these methods there are various prediction tools under study. This study includes prediction of hemoglobin using various tools. The results produced inferred knowledge with reference to percentage of amino acids participating to produce helices, sheets and coils. PHD and DSC produced the best of the results out of all the tools used.


In bioinformatics the prediction of the secondary structure of the protein from its primary amino acid sequence is very difficult, which has a huge impact on the field of science and medicine. The hardest part is how to learn the most effective and correct protein features to improve prediction. Here, we carry out a deep learning model to enhance structure prediction. The core achievement of this paper is a group of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that can manage high-level relational features from a pair of input protein sequence and target protein sequences. This paper contrasts the different type of recurrent network in recurrent neural networks (RNNs). In addition, the emphasis is on more advanced systems which incorporate a gating utility is called long short term memory (LSTM) unit and the newly added gated recurrent unit (GRU). This recurrent units has been calculated on the basis of predicting protein secondary structure using an amino acid sequence. The dataset has been taken from a publicly available database server (RCSB), and this study shows that advanced recurrent units LSTM is better than GRU for a long protein sequence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaheh Kashani-Amin ◽  
Ozra Tabatabaei-Malazy ◽  
Amirhossein Sakhteman ◽  
Bagher Larijani ◽  
Azadeh Ebrahim-Habibi

Background: Prediction of proteins’ secondary structure is one of the major steps in the generation of homology models. These models provide structural information which is used to design suitable ligands for potential medicinal targets. However, selecting a proper tool between multiple Secondary Structure Prediction (SSP) options is challenging. The current study is an insight into currently favored methods and tools, within various contexts. Objective: A systematic review was performed for a comprehensive access to recent (2013-2016) studies which used or recommended protein SSP tools. Methods: Three databases, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched and 99 out of the 209 studies were finally found eligible to extract data. Results: Four categories of applications for 59 retrieved SSP tools were: (I) prediction of structural features of a given sequence, (II) evaluation of a method, (III) providing input for a new SSP method and (IV) integrating an SSP tool as a component for a program. PSIPRED was found to be the most popular tool in all four categories. JPred and tools utilizing PHD (Profile network from HeiDelberg) method occupied second and third places of popularity in categories I and II. JPred was only found in the two first categories, while PHD was present in three fields. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive insight into the recent usage of SSP tools which could be helpful for selecting a proper tool.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document