Two-Phase Theory and Fluidized Bed Reactor Models

Author(s):  
P. N. ROWE
2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 571-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taketoshi Kurooka ◽  
Ryohei Yamazaki ◽  
Guiqing Liu

1967 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-400,a1
Author(s):  
Ryozo Toei ◽  
Ryuichi Matsuno ◽  
Isao Fujiki
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subramaniam Sadhasivam ◽  
Sivasubramanian Savitha ◽  
Krishnasamy Swaminathan ◽  
Feng-Huei Lin

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daoyin Liu ◽  
Zhonglin Zhang ◽  
Yaming Zhuang ◽  
Xiaoping Chen

AbstractCO2 capture using solid sorbents in fluidized bed reactors is a promising technology. The multiphase CFD model is increasingly developed to study the reactors, but it is difficult to model all the realistic details and it requires significant computational time. In this study, both the multiphase CFD model (i.e., CFD-DEM model coupled with reaction) and the simplified reactor models (i.e., plug flow model and bubbling two-phase model) are developed for modeling a fluidized bed CO2 capture reactor. The comparisons are made at different gas velocities from fixed bed to fluidized bed. The DEM based model reveals a detailed view of CO2 adsorption process with particle flow dynamics, based on which the assumptions in the simplified models can be evaluated. The plug flow model predictions generally show similar trends to the DEM model but there are quantitative differences; thus, it can be used to determine the reactor performance limit. The bubbling two-phase model gives better predictions than the plug flow model because the effect of bubbles on the inter-phase mass transfer and reaction is included. In the future, a closer combination of the multiphase CFD simulation and the simplified reactor models will likely be an efficient design method of CO2 capture fluidized bed reactors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document