Recent Advances in Environmental Risk Assessment of Transformation Products

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 3835-3847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beate I. Escher ◽  
Kathrin Fenner
Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1796 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Pereira ◽  
Liliana Silva ◽  
Célia Laranjeiro ◽  
Celeste Lino ◽  
Angelina Pena

Potential risks associated with releases of human pharmaceuticals into the environment have become an increasingly important issue in environmental health. This concern has been driven by the widespread detection of pharmaceuticals in all aquatic compartments. Therefore, 22 pharmaceuticals, 6 metabolites and transformation products, belonging to 7 therapeutic groups, were selected to perform a review on their toxicity and environmental risk assessment (ERA) in different aquatic compartments, important issues to tackle the water framework directive (WFD). The toxicity data collected reported, with the exception of anxiolytics, at least one toxicity value for concentrations below 1 µg L−1. The results obtained for the ERA revealed risk quotients (RQs) higher than 1 in all the aquatic bodies and for the three trophic levels, algae, invertebrates and fish, posing ecotoxicological pressure in all of these compartments. The therapeutic groups with higher RQs were hormones, antiepileptics, anti-inflammatories and antibiotics. Unsurprisingly, RQs values were highest in wastewaters, however, less contaminated water bodies such as groundwaters still presented maximum values up to 91,150 regarding 17α-ethinylestradiol in fish. Overall, these results present an important input for setting prioritizing measures and sustainable strategies, minimizing their impact in the aquatic environment.


Apidologie ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik F. Brodsgaard ◽  
Camilla J. Brodsgaard ◽  
Henrik Hansen ◽  
G�bor L. L�vei

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 394-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Scholz ◽  
Stephan Fischer ◽  
Ulrike Gündel ◽  
Eberhard Küster ◽  
Till Luckenbach ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol preprint (2009) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Heike Schmitt ◽  
Tatiana Boucard ◽  
Jeanne Garric ◽  
John Jensen ◽  
Joanne Parrott ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 713-830
Author(s):  
John H. Duffus ◽  
Michael Schwenk ◽  
Douglas M. Templeton

Abstract The primary objective of this glossary is to give clear definitions for those who contribute to studies relevant to these disciplines, or who must interpret them, but are not themselves reproductive physiologists or physicians. This applies especially to chemists who need to understand the literature of reproductive and teratogenic effects of substances without recourse to a multiplicity of other glossaries or dictionaries. The glossary includes terms related to basic and clinical reproductive biology and teratogenesis, insofar as they are necessary for a self-contained document, particularly terms related to diagnosing, measuring, and understanding the effects of substances on the embryo, the fetus, and on the male and female reproductive systems. The glossary consists of about 1200 primary alphabetical entries and includes Annexes of common abbreviations and examples of chemicals with known effects on human reproduction and development. The authors hope that toxicologists, pharmacologists, medical practitioners, risk assessors, and regulatory authorities are among the groups who will find this glossary helpful, in addition to chemists. In particular, the glossary should facilitate the worldwide use of chemical terminology in relation to occupational and environmental risk assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document