Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Liver Tumors

1998 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingmar Lax
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wu-zhou Li ◽  
Zhi-wen Liang ◽  
Yi Cao ◽  
Ting-ting Cao ◽  
Hong Quan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tumor motion may compromise the accuracy of liver stereotactic radiotherapy. In order to carry out a precise planning, estimating liver tumor motion during radiotherapy has received a lot of attention. Previous approach may have difficult to deal with image data corrupted by noise. The iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is widely used for estimating the rigid registration of three-dimensional point sets when these data were dense or corrupted. In the light of this, our study estimated the three-dimensional (3D) rigid motion of liver tumors during stereotactic liver radiotherapy using reconstructed 3D coordinates of fiducials based on the ICP algorithm. Methods Four hundred ninety-five pairs of orthogonal kilovoltage (KV) images from the CyberKnife stereo imaging system for 12 patients were used in this study. For each pair of images, the 3D coordinates of fiducial markers inside the liver were calculated via geometric derivations. The 3D coordinates were used to calculate the real-time translational and rotational motion of liver tumors around three axes via an ICP algorithm. The residual error was also investigated both with and without rotational correction. Results The translational shifts of liver tumors in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP),and superior-inferior (SI) directions were 2.92 ± 1.98 mm, 5.54 ± 3.12 mm, and 16.22 ± 5.86 mm, respectively; the rotational angles in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions were 3.95° ± 3.08°, 4.93° ± 2.90°, and 4.09° ± 1.99°, respectively. Rotational correction decreased 3D fiducial displacement from 1.19 ± 0.35 mm to 0.65 ± 0.24 mm (P<0.001). Conclusions The maximum translational movement occurred in the SI direction. Rotational correction decreased fiducial displacements and increased tumor tracking accuracy.


Author(s):  
T Schefter ◽  
L.E Gaspar ◽  
B Kavanagh ◽  
N Ceronsky ◽  
A Feiner ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga R. Brook ◽  
Eavan Thornton ◽  
Mishal Mendiratta-Lala ◽  
Anand Mahadevan ◽  
Vassilious Raptopoulos ◽  
...  

Purpose. To study radiological response to stereotactic radiotherapy for focal liver tumors.Materials and Methods. In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study CTs of 68 consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic radiotherapy for liver tumors between 01/2006 and 01/2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Two independent reviewers evaluated lesion volume and enhancement pattern of the lesion and of juxtaposed liver parenchyma.Results. 36 subjects with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 25 with liver metastases, and seven with cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) were included in study. Mean follow-up time was 5.6 ± 7.1 months for HCC, 6.4 ± 5.1 months for metastases, and 10.1 ± 4.8 months for the CCC. Complete response was seen in 4/36 (11.1%) HCCs and 1/25 (4%) metastases. Partial response (>30% decrease in long diameter) was seen in 25/36 (69%) HCCs, 14/25 (58%) metastases, and 7/7 (100%) of CCCs. Partial response followed by local recurrence (>20% increase in long diameter from nadir) occurred in 2/36 (6%) HCCs and 4/25 (17%) metastases. Liver parenchyma adjacent to the lesion demonstrated a prominent halo of delayed enhancement in 27/36 (78%) of HCCs, 19/21 (91%) of metastases, and 7/7 (100%) of CCCs.Conclusion. Sustainable radiological partial response to stereotactic radiotherapy is most frequent outcome seen in liver lesions. Prominent halo of delayed enhancement of the adjacent liver is frequent finding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 035007
Author(s):  
Ekin Ermiş ◽  
Marcela Blatti-Moreno ◽  
Dominic Leiser ◽  
Nikola Cihoric ◽  
Daniel Schmidhalter ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 958-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Gunvén ◽  
Eduard Jonas ◽  
Henric Blomgren ◽  
Eva Rutkowska ◽  
Kristin Karlsson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
X. Mirabel ◽  
A. Hollebecque ◽  
F. Le Tinier ◽  
J.E. Bibault ◽  
S. Dharancy ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik Vandenbroucke ◽  
Vincent Vinh-Hung ◽  
Barbara Craggs ◽  
Nico Buls ◽  
Johan de Mey

2009 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 515-517
Author(s):  
Peter Gunvén ◽  
Eduard Jonas ◽  
Peter Wersäll ◽  
Ingmar Lax

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document