Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Pascal Wabnitz ◽  
Michael Schulz ◽  
Michael Löhr ◽  
André Nienaber
2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-370
Author(s):  
Shuta Tomisato ◽  
Yasuto Yada ◽  
Sae Shiraisi ◽  
Koichiro Wasano

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263348952110536
Author(s):  
Eric D.A. Hermes ◽  
Robert A. Rosenheck ◽  
Laura Burrone ◽  
Greg Dante ◽  
Carrie Lukens ◽  
...  

Background Digital interventions delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for insomnia (Digital CBTi) may increase utilization of effective care for a common and serious condition. A low-intensity implementation strategy may facilitate digital CBTi use in healthcare settings. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of implementing a digital CBTi in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care through iterative modifications to a low-intensity implementation strategy, while evaluating clinical outcomes of a specific digital CBTi program. Methods A self-directed digital CBTi was implemented in the primary care clinics of a single VA facility using a cohort trial design that iteratively modified an implementation strategy over three 8-month phases. The phase 1 implementation strategy included (1) provider education; (2) point-of-care information via pamphlets; and (3) provider referral to digital CBTi through phone calls or messages. Phases 2 and 3 maintained these activities, while (1) adding a clinic-based coach who performed initial patient education and follow-up support contacts, (2) providing additional recruitment pathways, and (3) integrating the referral mechanism into provider workflow. Implementation outcomes included provider adoption, patient adoption, and acceptability. Clinical outcomes (insomnia severity, depression severity, and sedative hypnotic use) were compared among enrollees at baseline and 10 weeks. Results Across all phases 66 providers (48.9%) made 153 referrals, representing 0.38% of unique clinic patients. Of referrals, 77 (50.3%) enrolled in the study, 45 (29.4%) engaged in the program, and 24 (15.7%) completed it. Provider and patient adoption did not differ meaningfully across phases. Among enrollees, digital CBTi was acceptable and the Insomnia Severity Index decreased by 4.3 points (t = 6.41, p < 0.001) and 13 (18.6%) reached remission. The mean number of weakly sedative-hypnotic doses decreased by 2.2 (35.5%) (t = 2.39, p < 0.02). Conclusions Digital CBTi implementation in VA primary care is feasible using low-intensity implementation strategy, resulting in improved clinical outcomes for users. However, iterative implementation strategy modifications did not improve adoption. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03151083).


2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (08) ◽  
pp. 362-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Wabnitz ◽  
Michael Löhr ◽  
André Nienaber ◽  
Bruno Hemkendreis ◽  
Klaus Kronmüller ◽  
...  

ZusammenfassungDie Bezeichnung Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapie (LI-CBT) (in der Übersetzung etwa „niedrigintensive kognitive Verhaltenstherapie“) beschreibt Versorgungsangebote, die das Ziel verfolgen, den Zugang zu evidenzbasierten psychologischen Therapien zu verbessern. Dies wird erreicht indem (1) die Kontaktzeit zwischen Therapeut und Patient reduziert wird, (2) Fachkräfte mit speziellem Training aber ohne langjährige psychotherapeutische Qualifikation und (3) Interventionen mit variabler Intensität eingesetzt werden. Gestufte (Stepped-care) und berufsgruppen-vernetzende (Collaborative-care) Versorgungsstrukturen bilden den strukturellen Rahmen für eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung von LI-CBT. Während sich international großangelegte Forschungs- und Praxisprojekte diesem Thema widmen, liegt die Entwicklung in Deutschland deutlich zurück. Gerade vor dem Hintergrund wachsender Bedarfe und Inanspruchnahmen sowie der Zielsetzung von politischer Seite, neue Versorgungsformen zu entwickeln, stellte das Konzept LI-CBT daher einen vielversprechenden Ansatz dar.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (07) ◽  
pp. 961-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Kaddour ◽  
Naoko Kishita ◽  
Anthony Schaller

ABSTRACTObjectives:This study aimed to review the effectiveness of low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)–based interventions for informal dementia caregivers when compared to non-active control conditions.Design:Literature searches were conducted in databases of published (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus) and unpublished (Open Grey, ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest) literature. Individual meta-analyses were conducted for each outcome variable. Pooled intervention effect estimates were calculated as Hedge’sgusing a random-effects model.Included studies:Studies examining the effect of low-intensity CBT-based interventions for informal caregivers for people with any progressive dementia were included. Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials were included.Measurements:Outcomes included the psychological variables of anxiety, depression, burden, and distress (defined as stress or strain).Results:A total of five studies reported anxiety outcomes, 12 reported on depression, three reported on burden, and six reported distress outcomes. Results demonstrated a significant effect of low-intensity CBT-based interventions in reducing all examined psychological difficulties. Small effect sizes were found for anxiety (g= 0.35), depression (g= 0.27), and distress (g= 0.33). A medium effect was found for burden (g= 0.53).Conclusions:The results provide initial support for low-intensity CBT-based interventions for dementia caregivers. Clinical implications and research recommendations are explored. Strengths and limitations of the study are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Woodford ◽  
Paul Farrand ◽  
Josefin Hagström ◽  
Li Hedenmalm ◽  
Louise von Essen

BACKGROUND Parents of children treated for cancer may report psychological distress following the end of treatment. However, psychological support needs are commonly unmet and there is lack of evidence-based interventions tailored to the population. An internet-administered low-intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) based self-help intervention (EJDeR; intErnetbaserad sJälvhjälp för förälDrar till barn som avslutat en behandling mot canceR) may provide a solution. OBJECTIVE To describe the development of the EJDeR intervention adopting the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist to detail specific intervention factors. METHODS EJDeR was developed through a multistage approach, including the use of existing evidence, conceptualization of distress, participatory action research, cross- sectional survey, and professional and public involvement. It utilizes low-intensity CBT behavioral activation and worry management treatment protocols for Depression and/or Generalized Anxiety Disorder tailored towards the population. EJDeR is delivered via the U-CARE-portal, an online platform including written, film, audio content and videoconferencing, in-portal e-mail guidance, logging of participant and therapist activity, and automatic reminders. Parents are guided to use EJDeR by e-therapists, comprising psychology program students, in at least their fourth year of study after having completed a term of advanced studies in CBT. RESULTS An overview of the development process and a description of EJDeR informed by the TIDieR checklist are presented. Adaptations to EJDeR made in response to public involvement are highlighted. EJDeR is currently being tested in a feasibility study of an internet-administered intervention for parents of children previously treated for cancer (the ENGAGE study). CONCLUSIONS EJDeR represents a novel approach to support parents of children treated for cancer. Adopting a low-intensity CBT approach, guided by e-therapists, and internet-administered delivery represents a unique approach to improve access to mental health support for parents of children treated for cancer. Adopting TIDieR to report EJDeR offers potential to enhance fidelity to the intervention protocol and facilitate later implementation. CLINICALTRIAL ENGAGE study: ISRCTN 57233429 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023708


Author(s):  
Glenn Waller ◽  
Helen Cordery ◽  
Emma Corstorphine ◽  
Hendrik Hinrichsen ◽  
Rachel Lawson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document