scholarly journals Light δ13C events during deglaciation of the East Greenland Continental Shelf attributed to methane release from gas hydrates

2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 2217-2220 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Smith ◽  
J. P. Sachs ◽  
A. E. Jennings ◽  
D. M. Anderson ◽  
A. deVernal
2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (24) ◽  
pp. 6215-6220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Serov ◽  
Sunil Vadakkepuliyambatta ◽  
Jürgen Mienert ◽  
Henry Patton ◽  
Alexey Portnov ◽  
...  

Seafloor methane release due to the thermal dissociation of gas hydrates is pervasive across the continental margins of the Arctic Ocean. Furthermore, there is increasing awareness that shallow hydrate-related methane seeps have appeared due to enhanced warming of Arctic Ocean bottom water during the last century. Although it has been argued that a gas hydrate gun could trigger abrupt climate change, the processes and rates of subsurface/atmospheric natural gas exchange remain uncertain. Here we investigate the dynamics between gas hydrate stability and environmental changes from the height of the last glaciation through to the present day. Using geophysical observations from offshore Svalbard to constrain a coupled ice sheet/gas hydrate model, we identify distinct phases of subglacial methane sequestration and subsequent release on ice sheet retreat that led to the formation of a suite of seafloor domes. Reconstructing the evolution of this dome field, we find that incursions of warm Atlantic bottom water forced rapid gas hydrate dissociation and enhanced methane emissions during the penultimate Heinrich event, the Bølling and Allerød interstadials, and the Holocene optimum. Our results highlight the complex interplay between the cryosphere, geosphere, and atmosphere over the last 30,000 y that led to extensive changes in subseafloor carbon storage that forced distinct episodes of methane release due to natural climate variability well before recent anthropogenic warming.


1996 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 85-87
Author(s):  
H.C Larsen

The Danish Lithosphere Centre (DLC) is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation and was established in 1994 (Larsen, 1995). In 1995 DLC undertook major field geological investigations in both West and East Greenland, and within the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) drilling on the continental shelf offshore East Greenland. More than 50 national and international researchers were involved in DLC field geological programmes, and 25 researchers from ODP member countries took part in the offshore drilling operations. The general aims and scope of these activities as well as the continued development of the Centre are summarised below. Preliminary results of the 1995 work programmes are given by van Gool et al., Larsen et al. and Brooks et al. (all this report).


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Evans ◽  
Colm Ó Cofaigh ◽  
Julian A. Dowdeswell ◽  
Peter Wadhams

2018 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.S. Yakushev ◽  
A.P. Semenov ◽  
V.I. Bogoyavlensky ◽  
V.I. Medvedev ◽  
I.V. Bogoyavlensky

1975 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 88-91
Author(s):  
H.C Larsen

During 1974, aeromagnetic profiling and mapping were carried out in two different parts of East Greenland (fig. 20). The most southerly area comprised the continental shelf between 63°30' and 66°N (Angmagssalik district), while the northern area covered the sedimentary basin of late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic rocks forming the land surface between 70° and 74°N.


1993 ◽  
Vol 111 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 37-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian A. Dowdeswell ◽  
Heinrich Villinger ◽  
Robert J. Whittington ◽  
Peter Marienfeld

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Renssen ◽  
C. J. Beets ◽  
T. Fichefet ◽  
H. Goosse ◽  
D. Kroon

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-28
Author(s):  
Mazlan Madon ◽  

Activities by coastal States in relation to the exploration and exploitation of non-living natural resources (namely hydrocarbons and deep-sea minerals) on the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles (M) from their territorial sea baselines are reviewed. Geological conditions dictate such that hydrocarbons are likely to occur where there are thick accumulations of sediments (at least 2-3 km is needed for organic matter to generate significant amounts of hydrocarbons), whereas deep-sea minerals are found on or beneath the seabed of the deep oceans, which are generally “starved” of sediment. Thus, in general, sites for hydrocarbon exploration and for deep-sea mineral exploration are unlikely to overlap. On a ‘normal’ geological shelf with an average width of say ~60-100 km, hydrocarbon exploration is carried out generally within the 200 M limit of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of the coastal State. Within the last decade, however, necessitated by depleting resources in the shallow waters of the shelf and slope, exploration has gradually moved from the geological shelf (water depth typically < 200 m) further out into deeper waters, and in some cases, beyond the 200 M limit. Thus far, only in a few places is oil and gas exploration being carried out on the continental shelf beyond 200 M. Examples include Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Argentina and Canada. Such activities mainly involve geological and geophysical investigations and assessment of the hydrocarbon potential, while some have resulted in commercial production. Besides the conventional hydrocarbons (oil and gas), continental margin sediments may also host significant accumulations of gas hydrates, which are regarded as a potentially important energy resource of the future. Along non-polar continental margins, gas hydrates are generally found beneath the continental slope and the continental rise, i.e. beyond the continental shelf proper, in water depths typically greater than 500 m but still mainly within 200 M of the territorial sea baselines. Where the continental margin is exceptionally wide, however, gas hydrates may occur in areas beyond the 200 M limit, on the extended continental shelf.


1993 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
H.C Larsen

The exposures of the Tertiary igneous rocks along the East Greenland coast (Fig. I) have attracted the attention or earth scientists for more than half a century (Wager, 1934; Wager & Deer 1938). However, most of the work has concentrated on the petrological and mineralogical aspects of the magmatic rocks (e.g. Skaergaard intrusion). With a few exceptions, such as Brooks (1973). Nielsen (1978). H. C. Larsen (1978), Branks (1979), Myers (1980) and Nielsen & Branks (1981). Relatively little attention has been given to the tectonic and plate tectonic setting. mainly because the plate tectonic paradigm did not become accepted until 30 years after Wager and Deer's revolutionary work. Furthermore, the tectonic context of the coastal exposures first becomes really striking when seen together with the geology and structure of the adjacent continental shelf and slope (H.C. Larsen, 1990).


1995 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 352 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Williams ◽  
J. T. Andrews ◽  
N. J. Weiner ◽  
P. J. Mudie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document