Experimental modeling of methane release from intrapermafrost relic gas hydrates when sediment temperature change

2018 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.S. Yakushev ◽  
A.P. Semenov ◽  
V.I. Bogoyavlensky ◽  
V.I. Medvedev ◽  
I.V. Bogoyavlensky
2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (24) ◽  
pp. 6215-6220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Serov ◽  
Sunil Vadakkepuliyambatta ◽  
Jürgen Mienert ◽  
Henry Patton ◽  
Alexey Portnov ◽  
...  

Seafloor methane release due to the thermal dissociation of gas hydrates is pervasive across the continental margins of the Arctic Ocean. Furthermore, there is increasing awareness that shallow hydrate-related methane seeps have appeared due to enhanced warming of Arctic Ocean bottom water during the last century. Although it has been argued that a gas hydrate gun could trigger abrupt climate change, the processes and rates of subsurface/atmospheric natural gas exchange remain uncertain. Here we investigate the dynamics between gas hydrate stability and environmental changes from the height of the last glaciation through to the present day. Using geophysical observations from offshore Svalbard to constrain a coupled ice sheet/gas hydrate model, we identify distinct phases of subglacial methane sequestration and subsequent release on ice sheet retreat that led to the formation of a suite of seafloor domes. Reconstructing the evolution of this dome field, we find that incursions of warm Atlantic bottom water forced rapid gas hydrate dissociation and enhanced methane emissions during the penultimate Heinrich event, the Bølling and Allerød interstadials, and the Holocene optimum. Our results highlight the complex interplay between the cryosphere, geosphere, and atmosphere over the last 30,000 y that led to extensive changes in subseafloor carbon storage that forced distinct episodes of methane release due to natural climate variability well before recent anthropogenic warming.


2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 2217-2220 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Smith ◽  
J. P. Sachs ◽  
A. E. Jennings ◽  
D. M. Anderson ◽  
A. deVernal

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Renssen ◽  
C. J. Beets ◽  
T. Fichefet ◽  
H. Goosse ◽  
D. Kroon

Geosciences ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 428
Author(s):  
Leopold Lobkovsky

A seismogenic trigger mechanism is proposed to explain the abrupt climate warming phases in the Arctic as a result of strong mechanical disturbances in the marginal region of the Arctic lithosphere. Those disturbances might have been caused by great earthquakes in the Aleutian subduction zone, and slowly propagated across the Arctic shelf and adjacent regions, triggering the methane release from permafrost and metastable gas hydrates, followed by greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. The proposed mechanism is based on the identified correlation between the series of the great earthquakes in the Aleutian island arc, which occurred in the early and middle of the 20th century, and the two phases of sharp climate warming, which began in 1920 and 1980. There is a 20-year time lag between these events, which is explained by the time of arrival of deformation waves in the lithosphere (propagating with a velocity of about 100 km per year) at the Arctic shelf and adjacent land from the Aleutian subduction zone, the region of their generation. The trigger mechanism causing the methane release from permafrost and metastable gas hydrates is related to the destruction of micro-sized ice films covering gas hydrate particles, the elements highly important for hydrate self-preservation, as well as destruction of gas-saturated micropores in permafrost rocks due to the slight additional stresses associated with deformation waves, and thus emergence of conditions favorable for gas filtration and its subsequent emission.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1139-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Dickens

Abstract. Enormous amounts of 13C-depleted carbon rapidly entered the exogenic carbon cycle during the onset of the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM), as attested to by a prominent negative δ13C excursion and widespread seafloor carbonate dissolution. A widely cited explanation for this carbon input has been thermal dissociation of gas hydrate, followed by release of massive CH4 from the seafloor and its subsequent oxidation to CO2 in the ocean or atmosphere. Increasingly, papers have argued against this mechanism, but without fully considering existing ideas and available data. Moreover, other explanations have been presented as plausible alternatives, even though they conflict with geological observations, they raise major conceptual problems, or both. Methane release from gas hydrates remains a congruous explanation for the δ


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document