scholarly journals Dependence of SuperDARN cross polar cap potential upon the solar wind electric field and magnetopause subsolar distance

2008 ◽  
Vol 113 (A9) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ya. Khachikjan ◽  
A. V. Koustov ◽  
G. J. Sofko
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Cross Polar Cap Potential

scholarly journals Effects of the solar wind electric field and ionospheric conductance on the cross polar cap potential: Results of global MHD modeling

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (23) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
V. G. Merkine ◽  
K. Papadopoulos ◽  
G. Milikh ◽  
A. S. Sharma ◽  
X. Shao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Mhd Modeling ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Cross Polar Cap Potential

scholarly journals A new formulation for the ionospheric cross polar cap potential including saturation effects

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 3533-3547 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Ridley
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Pressure Balance ◽  
Simple Modification ◽  
Post Shock ◽  
Cross Polar Cap Potential ◽  
New Formulation

Abstract. It is known that the ionospheric cross polar cap potential (CPCP) saturates when the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) Bz becomes very large. Few studies have offered physical explanations as to why the polar cap potential saturates. We present 13 events in which the reconnection electric field (REF) goes above 12mV/m at some time. When these events are examined as typically done in previous studies, all of them show some signs of saturation (i.e., over-prediction of the CPCP based on a linear relationship between the IMF and the CPCP). We show that by taking into account the size of the magnetosphere and the fact that the post-shock magnetic field strength is strongly dependent upon the solar wind Mach number, we can better specify the ionospheric CPCP. The CPCP (Φ) can be expressed as Φ=(10-4v2+11.7B(1-e-Ma/3)sin3(θ/2)) {rms/9 (where v is the solar wind velocity, B is the combined Y and Z components of the interplanetary magnetic field, Ma is the solar wind Mach number, θ=acos(Bz/B), and rms is the stand-off distance to the magnetopause, assuming pressure-balance between the solar wind and the magnetosphere). This is a simple modification of the original Boyle et al. (1997) formulation.

scholarly journals On the SuperDARN cross polar cap potential saturation effect

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3755-3764 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Koustov ◽  
G. Ya. Khachikjan ◽  
R. A. Makarevich ◽  
C. Bryant
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Linear Trend ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Northern Summer ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Cross Polar Cap Potential ◽  
Hemisphere Winter ◽  
Magnetic Index

Abstract. Variation of the cross polar cap potential (CPCP) with the interplanetary electric field (IEF), the merging electric field EKL, the Polar Cap North (PCN) magnetic index, and the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling function EC of Newell et al. (2007) is investigated by considering convection data collected by the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) in the Northern Hemisphere. Winter and summer observations are considered separately. All variations considered show close to linear trend at small values of the parameters and tendency for the saturation at large values. The threshold values starting from which the non-linearity was evident were estimated to be IEF*~EKL*~3 mV/m, PCN*~3–4, and EC*~1.5×104. The data indicate that saturation starts at larger values of the above parameters and reaches larger (up to 10 kV) saturation levels during summer. Conclusions are supported by a limited data set of simultaneous SuperDARN observations in the Northern (summer) and Southern (winter) Hemispheres. It is argued that the SuperDARN CPCP saturation levels and the thresholds for the non-linearity to be seen are affected by the method of the CPCP estimates.

Polar cap electric field dependence on solar wind and magnetotail parameters

1981 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1261-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Longenecker ◽  
J. G. Roederer
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Field Dependence ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Electric Field Dependence

scholarly journals Invariability of relationship between the polar cap magnetic activity and geoeffective interplanetary electric field

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1479-1489 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. A. Troshichev ◽  
N. A. Podorozhkina ◽  
A. S. Janzhura
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Activity ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Solar Minimum ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Magnetic Activity ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Polar Caps ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Wind Energy Input

Abstract. The PC (polar cap) index characterizing the solar wind energy input into the magnetosphere is calculated with use of parameters α, β, and φ, determining the relationship between the interplanetary electric field (EKL) and the value of magnetic activity δF in the polar caps. These parameters were noted as valid for large and small EKL values, and as a result the suggestion was made (Troshichev et al., 2006) that the parameters should remain invariant irrespective of solar activity. To verify this suggestion, the independent sets of calibration parameters α, β, and φ were derived separately for the solar maximum (1998–2001) and solar minimum (1997, 2007–2009) epochs, with a proper choice of a quiet daily variation (QDC) as a level of reference for the polar cap magnetic activity value. The results presented in this paper demonstrate that parameters α, β, and φ, derived under conditions of solar maximum and solar minimum, are indeed in general conformity and provide consistent (within 10 % uncertainty) estimations of the PC index. It means that relationship between the geoeffective solar wind variations and the polar cap magnetic activity responding to these variations remains invariant irrespective of solar activity. The conclusion is made that parameters α, β, and φ derived in AARI#3 version for complete cycle of solar activity (1995–2005) can be regarded as forever valid.

scholarly journals Response of the reconnection electric field and polar cap potential to the IMF and velocity of solar wind

2010 ◽  
Vol 72 (13) ◽  
pp. 1019-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichiro Fukazawa ◽  
Tomoharu Aoyama ◽  
Tatsuki Ogino ◽  
Kiyohumi Yumoto
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
The Imf
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document