scholarly journals Crustal structure of Deception Island volcano fromPwave seismic tomography: Tectonic and volcanic implications

Author(s):  
Daria Zandomeneghi ◽  
Andrew Barclay ◽  
Javier Almendros ◽  
Jesús M. Ibañez Godoy ◽  
William S. D. Wilcock ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 187 (1) ◽  
pp. 303-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hrvoje Tkalčić ◽  
Youlin Chen ◽  
Ruifeng Liu ◽  
Huang Zhibin ◽  
Li Sun ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. MUÑOZ-MARTÍN ◽  
M. CATALÁN ◽  
J. MARTÍN-DÁVILA ◽  
A. CARBÓ

Deception Island is a young, active volcano located in the south-western part of Bransfield Strait, between the Antarctic Peninsula and the South Shetland archipelago. New gravity and magnetic data, from a marine geophysical cruise (DECVOL-99), were analysed. Forty-eight survey lines were processed and mapped around Deception Island to obtain Bouguer and magnetic anomaly maps. These maps show well- defined groups of gravity and magnetic anomalies, as well as their gradients. To constrain the upper crustal structure, we have performed 2+1/2D forward modelling on three profiles perpendicular to the main anomalies of the area, and taking into account previously published seismic information. From the gravity and magnetic models, two types of crust were identified. These were interpreted as continental crust (located north of Deception Island) and more basic crust (south of Deception Island). The transition between these crustal types is evident in the Bouguer anomaly map as a high gradient area trending NE–SW. Both magnetic and gravity data show a wide minimum at the eastern part of Deception Island, which suggests a very low bulk susceptibility and low density intrusive body. With historical recorded eruptions and thermal and fumarolic fields, we interpret this anomaly as a partially melted intrusive body. Its top has been estimated to be at 1.7 km depth using Euler deconvolution techniques.


2009 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tami Ben-Zvi ◽  
William S.D. Wilcock ◽  
Andrew H. Barclay ◽  
Daria Zandomeneghi ◽  
Jesús M. Ibáñez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Shulgin ◽  
Jan Erik Lie ◽  
Espen Harris Nilsen ◽  
Jan Inge Faleide ◽  
Sverre Planke

<p>The Barents Sea shelf has been covered by numerous wide-angle seismic profiles aiming to resolve the crustal structure of the shelf. However, the overall structural architecture of the crystalline crust is still not fully understood, due to limited and sparse distribution of deep-sampling seismic profiles. </p><p>The petroleum related seismic exploration in Norwegian waters has been ongoing for decades. The recent increase of the seismic broadband stations onshore (including temporal deployments) provokes the idea to use these stations and the active seismic sources from the regional seismic reflection surveys, including academic and industry seismic projects, to reveal the crustal-scale structure of the western Barents Sea.</p><p>We have analyzed seismic records from 8 permanent seismic stations from Norway, Sweden and Finland, and 12 temporally deployed broadband seismic stations from the ScanArray seismic network, which recorded more than 100’000 marine airgun shots from academic and oil industry campaigns in the south-western quarter of the Barents Sea.</p><p>The overall quality of the seismic records is exceptionally good. We observe clear phases recorded from offsets reaching 750 km. The identified phases include refracted crustal and mantle arrivals as well as Moho reflections, including both P and S waves. The overall quantity, quality, and the geometry of the seismic data makes it perfect for the application of the 3D joint refraction/reflection travel time seismic tomography to study the crustal structure of the Barents Sea. In this work we would like to present our first results from the 3D seismic tomography.</p>


2002 ◽  
Vol 107 (B12) ◽  
pp. ESE 22-1-ESE 22-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Van Wagoner ◽  
R. S. Crosson ◽  
K. C. Creager ◽  
G. Medema ◽  
L. Preston ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bogdan Zaharia ◽  
Bogdan Grecu ◽  
Mihaela Popa ◽  
Eugen Oros ◽  
Mircea Radulian

2004 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 311-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Evangelidis ◽  
T. A. Minshull ◽  
T. J. Henstock

1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Grad ◽  
A. Guterch ◽  
P. Środa

This paper describes the results of seismic refraction investigations of the upper crustal structure in the area of Deception Island, West Antarctica, which were made during the Polish Antarctic Geodynamical Expeditions in 1979-80 and 1987-88. In the caldera and immediate vicinity of Deception Island a layer of unconsolidated and poorly consolidated young sediments of 1.9–2.2 km s−1 P-wave velocity was found. Velocities of 4.1–4.3 km s−1 were found in the depth interval from 0.6–1.3 to about 3 km. Lateral differences in upper crustal structure between the south-eastern and western sectors were identified. In the region between Deception and Livingston islands an inclined boundary with a velocity of about 6.1 km s−1 occurs. A deep fault zone dividing crustal blocks beneath Deception Island is associated with a prominent volcanic line within Bransfield Strait extending between Deception and Bridgeman islands.


Geotectonics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. P. Yegorova ◽  
E. P. Baranova ◽  
V. S. Gobarenko ◽  
A. V. Murovskaya

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document