scholarly journals Quantifying the impact of anthropogenic nitrogen deposition on oceanic nitrous oxide

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Parvadha Suntharalingam ◽  
Erik Buitenhuis ◽  
Corinne Le Quéré ◽  
Frank Dentener ◽  
Cynthia Nevison ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Katye E. Altieri ◽  
Sarah E. Fawcett ◽  
Meredith G. Hastings

The budget of reactive nitrogen (Nr; oxidized and reduced inorganic and organic forms of nitrogen) has at least doubled since the preindustrial era due to human activities. There are significant detrimental effects of this excess Nr on many terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, although less is known about the impact on the open ocean. Nr deposition may already rival biological N2 fixation quantitatively and will likely continue to rise in the future. However, it is unclear how much of the Nr currently deposited to the ocean is external in origin. Understanding the importance of ocean Nr emissions versus external Nr deposition is key to quantifying the influence of deposition on ocean biogeochemistry and climate. This article reviews our understanding of the impacts of Nr deposition on the open ocean and the emissions of Nr from the ocean, placing particular emphasis on stable isotopes as a tool to investigate the surface ocean–lower atmosphere Nr cycle and its variations over time. ▪ The ocean has a dynamic exchange of reactive nitrogen with the atmosphere and is not just a passive recipient of nitrogen pollution from land. ▪ Tracing anthropogenic nitrogen deposition to the ocean is a challenge due to overlapping geochemical signatures with other nitrogen inputs. ▪ However, studies suggest an imprint of external (anthropogenic) nitrogen deposition in the Mediterranean Sea and North Pacific Ocean. ▪ Climate change will impact nitrogen emissions from the ocean through warming, acidification, stratification, and changes in food webs. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Volume 49 is May 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 356 (6339) ◽  
pp. 749-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haojia Ren ◽  
Yi-Chi Chen ◽  
Xingchen T. Wang ◽  
George T. F. Wong ◽  
Anne L. Cohen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 572-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruiying Chang ◽  
Wenjun Zhou ◽  
Yunting Fang ◽  
Haijian Bing ◽  
Xiangyang Sun ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 140-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brahney ◽  
A.P. Ballantyne ◽  
B.L. Turner ◽  
S.A. Spaulding ◽  
M. Otu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 92-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Hess ◽  
Thomas Niemeyer ◽  
Andreas Fichtner ◽  
Kirstin Jansen ◽  
Matthias Kunz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 4315-4330 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Mulder ◽  
J.-P. Hettelingh ◽  
L. Montanarella ◽  
M. R. Pasimeni ◽  
M. Posch ◽  
...  

Abstract. Long-term human interactions with landscape and nature produced a plethora of trends and patterns of environmental disturbances in time and space. Nitrogen deposition, closely tracking energy and land use, is known to be among the main pollution drivers, affecting both freshwater as terrestrial ecosystems. We investigated the geographical distribution of nitrogen deposition and the impacts of accumulation on recent soil carbon to nitrogen ratios over Europe. After the Second Industrial Revolution (1880–2010), large landscape stretches characterized by different atmospheric deposition caused either by industrialized areas or by intensive agriculture emerged. Nitrogen deposition affects in a still recognizable way recent soil C : N ratios despite the emission abatement of oxidized and reduced nitrogen during the last two decades. Given the seemingly disparate land-use history, we focused on ~ 10 000 unmanaged ecosystems, providing evidence for a rapid response of nature to chronic nitrogen supply by atmospheric deposition.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah R. Leeson ◽  
Peter E. Levy ◽  
Netty van Dijk ◽  
Julia Drewer ◽  
Sophie Robinson ◽  
...  

Abstract. Nitrogen deposition was experimentally increased on a Scottish peat bog over a period of thirteen years (2002–2015). Nitrogen was applied in three forms, NH3 gas, NH4+ solution, and NO3− solution, at rates ranging from ambient (8) to 64 kg N ha−1 y−1, and higher near the NH3 fumigation source. An automated system was used to apply the nitrogen, such that the deposition was realistic in terms of rates and high frequency of deposition events. We measured the response of nitrous oxide (N2O) flux to the increased nitrogen input. Prior expectations, based on the IPCC default emission factor, were that 1 % of the added nitrogen would be emitted as N2O. In the plots treated with NH4+ and NO3− solution, no response was seen, and there was a tendency for N2O fluxes to be reduced by additional nitrogen, though this was not significant. Areas subjected to high NH3 emitted more N2O than expected, up to 8.5 % of the added nitrogen. Differences in the response are related to the impact of the nitrogen treatments on the vegetation. In the NH4+ and NO3− treatments, all the additional nitrogen is effectively immobilised in the vegetation and top 10 cm of peat. In the NH3 treatment, much of the vegetation was killed off by high doses of NH3, and the nitrogen was presumably more available to denitrifying bacteria. The design of the wet and dry experimental treatments meant that they differed in statistical power, and we are less likely to detect an effect of the the NH4+ and NO3− treatments, though they avoid issues of pseudo-replication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document