Abstract
Several new techniques were used to identify zones of groundwater and contaminant inflow to the headwaters area of a small stream draining an agricultural watershed in southwestern Ontario. Along a 3 km length of stream, seepage meters were used to measure and collect seepage flux and mini-piezometers were used to measure piezometric head relative to the stream and to collect pore water 0.6 m below the streambed.
Measurement of seepage flux at 43 locations along a 3 km segment of Hillman Creek showed that most of the study section was a groundwater discharge zone. Spatial differences in seepage flux ranged from less than 0.001 to nearly 9 cm m s 1. During the growing season there was a marked diurnal change in seepage rate at several locations and this was also reflected by a corresponding change in stream discharge.
Paired samples, one from a piezometer 0.6 m below streambed and one from the adjacent seepage meter, were significantly correlated (P < 0.01) with respect to specific conductance, chloride and inorganic carbon concentration. This suggested that in many instances site-specific estimates of chemical inputs from groundwater to surface water can be estimated quickly without the necessity of allowing natural groundwater flow to flush out the water initially trapped within the seepage container. Seepage meters can be used to measure seepage flux and the small piezometers can be used to obtain samples. The concentrations of non-conservative solutes (organic carbon, nitrate + nitrite nitrogen, and phospate) in seepage meter samples were not significantly correlated with the concentrations in corresponding mini-piezometer samples.
Seasonal and Spatial Variation in the Location and Reactivity of a Nitrate‐Contaminated Groundwater Discharge Zone in a Lakebed
