seepage meter
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

54
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Schlüter ◽  
Philipp Maier

To quantify submarine groundwater discharge, we developed an inexpensive automated seepage meter that applies a tracer injection and the computation of the mean residence time. The SGD-MRT is designed to measure a wide range of discharge rates from about 30 to 800 cm³/min and allows minimizing backpressures caused by pipe friction or flow sensors. By modifying the inner volume of the flow-through unit, the range of measurement is adjustable to lower or higher discharge rates. For process control and data acquisition, an Arduino controller board is used. In addition, components like temperature, conductivity, and pressure sensors or pumps extend the scope of the seepage meter. During field tests in the Wadden Sea, covering tidal cycles, discharge rates of more than 700 cm³/min were released from sand boils. Based on the measured discharge rates and numerical integration of the time series data, a water volume of about 400 dm3 with a seawater content of less than 12% was released from the sand boil within 7 h.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongzhen Cheng ◽  
Yun Dong ◽  
Jingke Wu ◽  
Baoliang Li ◽  
Jihua Zhang

This research revealed the crack generation of the highway embankment from the water losing shrinkage of the wet black cotton soil (BCS), which is a type of soil with high swell-shrink potential. The road seepage meter was used to test the permeability of filling materials, which was used to replace BCS. The moisture content and embankment deflection of BCS foundation were measured after the rainy season. Based on the coupled consolidation theory for unsaturated soil, the change in additional tension stress of the embankment induced by water loss shrinkage of BCS was simulated by Abaqus. The results indicated that the rainfall seeped into the foundation through highly permeable refill materials to result in BCS expansion and decrease the embankment strength. After the rainy season, the additional tensile stress caused by water loss shrinkage of BCS induces cracking of highway embankment, and the maximum cracking depth often appears at the shoulder of highway. The deep and wide cracks are easy to appear in the low embankment constructed on a thick BCS foundation under strong evaporation.


Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
Julia Guimond ◽  
Joseph Tamborski

Groundwater–surface water exchange in salt marsh ecosystems mediates nearshore salt, nutrient, and carbon budgets with implications for biological productivity and global climate. Despite their importance, a synthesis of salt marsh groundwater studies is lacking. In this review, we summarize drivers mediating salt marsh hydrogeology, review field and modeling techniques, and discuss patterns of exchange. New data from a Delaware seepage meter study are reported which highlight small-scale spatial variability in exchange rates. A synthesis of the salt marsh hydrogeology literature reveals a positive relationship between tidal range and submarine groundwater discharge but not porewater exchange, highlighting the multidimensional drivers of marsh hydrogeology. Field studies are heavily biased towards microtidal systems of the US East Coast, with little global information available. A preliminary estimate of marsh porewater exchange along the Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic Bights is 8–30 × 1013 L y−1, equivalent to recirculating the entire volume of seawater overlying the shelf through tidal marsh sediments in ~30–90 years. This review concludes with a discussion of critical questions to address that will decrease uncertainty in global budget estimates and enhance our capacity to predict future responses to global climate change.


Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3267
Author(s):  
Donald O. Rosenberry ◽  
José Manuel Nieto López ◽  
Richard M. T. Webb ◽  
Sascha Müller

The efficiency of seepage meters, long considered a fixed property associated with the meter design, is not constant in highly permeable sediments. Instead, efficiency varies substantially with seepage bag fullness, duration of bag attachment, depth of meter insertion into the sediments, and seepage velocity. Tests conducted in a seepage test tank filled with isotropic sand with a hydraulic conductivity of about 60 m/d indicate that seepage meter efficiency varies widely and decreases unpredictably when the volume of the seepage bag is greater than about 65 to 70 percent full or less than about 15 to 20 percent full. Seepage generally decreases with duration of bag attachment even when operated in the mid-range of bag fullness. Stopping flow through the seepage meter during bag attachment or removal also results in a decrease in meter efficiency. Numerical modeling indicates efficiency is inversely related to hydraulic conductivity in highly permeable sediments. An efficiency close to 1 for a meter installed in sediment with a hydraulic conductivity of 1 m/d decreases to about 60 and then 10 percent when hydraulic conductivity is increased to 10 and 100 m/d, respectively. These large efficiency reductions apply only to high-permeability settings, such as wave- or tidally washed coarse sand or gravel, or fluvial settings with an actively mobile sand or gravel bed, where low resistance to flow through the porous media allows bypass flow around the seepage cylinder to readily occur. In more typical settings, much greater resistance to bypass flow suppresses small changes in meter resistance during inflation or deflation of seepage bags.


Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3071
Author(s):  
Changyong Lee ◽  
Wonbin Kim ◽  
Sung-Wook Jeen

The accuracy of groundwater flux measurement using a seepage meter was evaluated through a series of laboratory experiments under controlled flow conditions. Simulated groundwater influx and outflux rates were measured using a seepage meter, and the results were compared with the known water flux rates in our controlled tank flow system. Differences induced by the use of two different types of collection bag (Types 1 and 2) were also evaluated. The slopes of the trend lines between the controlled influx rate and influx as measured by the seepage meter were 0.6669 (for Type 1 bag) and 0.8563 (for Type 2 bag), suggesting that the groundwater influx rate as measured by the seepage meter may be less than the actual rate. This may be due to the resistance of the collection bags and head loss induced at the tubing orifice. With respect to outflux measurement, the slopes of the trend line were 1.3534 (for Type 1 bags) and 1.4748 (for Type 2 bags), suggesting that the outflux rate as measured by the seepage meter may be more than the actual rate. The size and wall thickness of the collection bag used affected the measured flux rates. This study suggests that, as long as errors can be identified, seepage meters can be a reliable means of studying groundwater–surface water interactions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naseem Akhtar ◽  
Muhammad Izzuddin Syakir ◽  
Mohd Talha Anees ◽  
Abdul Qadir ◽  
Mohamad Shaiful Yusuff

Groundwater system is very vital to humanity and the ecosystem. Aquifers are determined based on the absence or presence of water table positioning, that is, confined, unconfined, leaky aquifers and fractured aquifers. The objective of this chapter is to discuss the characteristic and assessment of groundwater within the scope of vertical distribution of GW, types of the aquifer system, types of SW-GW interface, and SW-GW interaction at both local and regional scales. The properties of the aquifer depend on the physical characteristics of the materials (porosity, permeability, specific yield, specific storage, and hydraulic conductivities) which are determined by techniques like resistivity surveys and pumping tests followed by remote sensing and geographic information system for better information on the groundwater system. Furthermore, understanding the SW-GW interactions through available methods (seepage meter, heat tracer, and environmental tracer) is useful in watershed management, that is, risk management and assessment of the aquifer system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kip Solomon ◽  
Eric Humphrey ◽  
Troy E. Gilmore ◽  
David P. Genereux ◽  
Vitaly Zlotnik
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly A. Zlotnik ◽  
D. Kip Solomon ◽  
Troy E. Gilmore ◽  
David P. Genereux ◽  
C. Eric Humphrey

<p>Most single-point methods of measuring seepage fluxes across the surface water-groundwater interface in lakes, streams, and estuaries (e.g., volumetric, head-based, and thermal) have one trait in common: they produce seepage rate values, averaged over substantial periods of time, thereby limiting resolution of the intra-day dynamics. Recently, Solomon et al. (Water Resources Research, 2019, in review) presented a new instrument and modification to a previously tested concept (Solder et al., Groundwater, 2016). This instrument has an open-bottom permeameter (OBP) design, which is commonly used for investigating hydraulic conductivity of the interface with falling or rising head tests, but historically not used for flux estimates. The novel dynamic seepage meter (DSM) evaluates the transient water level in the OBP-based instrument with submillimeter accuracy, exceeding the performance of traditional pressure transducers. The initial dynamics of the water level response over fractions of an hour holds the necessary information to infer the natural seepage rate in both gaining and losing conditions. The tests can be repeated frequently in an automatic regime. If a single test lasts long enough, hydraulic conductivity, in addition to the seepage rate can also be accurately determined. Here, a detailed hydrodynamic theory of the flow systems inside and outside the OBP is presented and the accuracy of measured water fluxes is investigated with emphasis on interpretation of the data with ambient noise. The results of this study will facilitate rapid, accurate, and massive data collection in diverse field conditions. (Research was supported by the NSF grant EAR 1744719.)</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document