scholarly journals Physical Sources of High‐Frequency Seismic Noise on Cascadia Initiative Ocean Bottom Seismometers

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose Hilmo ◽  
William S. D. Wilcock
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Naranjo ◽  
Laura Parisi ◽  
Philippe Jousset ◽  
Cornelis Weemstra ◽  
Sigurjón Jónsson

<p>Accurate timing of seismic records is essential for almost all applications in seismology. Wrong timing of the waveforms may result in incorrect Earth models and/or inaccurate earthquake locations. As such, it may render interpretations of underground processes incorrect. Ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs) experience clock drifts due to their inability to synchronize with a GNSS signal (with the correct reference time), since electromagnetic signals are unable to propagate efficiently in water. As OBSs generally operate in relatively stable ambient temperature, the timing deviation is usually assumed to be linear. Therefore, the time corrections can be estimated through GPS synchronization before deployment and after recovery of the instrument. However, if the instrument has run out of power prior to recovery (i.e., due to the battery being dead at the time of recovery), the timing error at the end of the deployment cannot be determined. In addition, the drift may not be linear, e.g., due to rapid temperature drop while the OBS sinks to the seabed. Here we present an algorithm that recovers the linear clock drift, as well as a potential timing error at the onset.</p><p>The algorithm presented in this study exploits seismic interferometry (SI). Specifically, time-lapse (averaged) cross-correlations of ambient seismic noise are computed. As such, virtual-source responses, which are generally dominated by the recorded surface waves, are retrieved. These interferometric responses generate two virtual sources: a causal wave (arriving at a positive time) and an acausal wave (arriving at a negative time). Under favorable conditions, both interferometric responses approach the surface-wave part of the medium's Green's function. Therefore, it is possible to calculate the clock drift for each station by exploiting the time-symmetry between the causal and acausal waves. For this purpose, the clock drift is calculated by measuring the differential arrival times of the causal and acausal waves for a large number of receiver-receiver pairs and computing the drift by carrying-out a least-squares inversion. The methodology described is applied to time-lapse cross-correlations of ambient seismic noise recorded on and around the Reykjanes peninsula, SW Iceland. The stations used for the analysis were deployed in the context of IMAGE (Integrated Methods for Advanced Geothermal Exploration) and consisted of 30 on-land stations and 24 ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs).  The seismic activity was recorded from spring 2014 until August 2015 on an area of around 100 km in diameter (from the tip of the Reykjanes peninsula).</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Schlindwein Vera ◽  
Kirk Henning ◽  
Hiller Marc ◽  
Scholz John-Robert ◽  
Schmidt-Aursch Mechita

<p>Active and passive seismic monitoring of the cryosphere is mostly done with land seismometers on the surface of ice masses. Seismic monitoring beneath sea ice at the bottom of ice covered oceans has hardly been attempted, because ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) are difficult to recover in perennial sea ice. As a result, for example the tectonic activity of the Arctic mid-ocean ridge system is poorly known. Recently, the ambient seismic noise in long-term seismic records proved a useful tool to monitor the state of the sea ice cover. Since sea ice effectively dampens the formation of wave action, the power in the microseismic noise band, that is mostly generated by ocean wave action, shows seasonal variations which can be explored to study ocean wave climate in relation to the sea ice cover.</p><p>From September 2018 - September 2019, we deployed for the first time a network of 4 broadband ocean bottom seismometers at distances of about 10 km at a water depth of roughly 4 km near Gakkel Deep on eastern Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean, from board RV Polarstern. We modified the Lobster-type OBS to include a Posidonia transponder that allowed to accurately track the OBS during descent and ascent and when surfacing underneath an ice floe. We then carefully broke the ice floes until the OBSs appeared in open water and could be recovered.</p><p>The network was designed to record local earthquakes along Gakkel Ridge, but it also yields valuable year-round data on the microseismic noise signal at the bottom of the Arctic Ocean in a marginal ice zone.</p><p>A first inspection of the data shows a clearly reduced power in the microseismic noise band compared to the Norwegian-Greenland Sea and strongly time dependent noise levels, that may potentially be related to temporary wave action when sea ice retreats during summer. However, the modified OBS structure with a large head buoy fixed to the OBS structure may also be prone to vibrations caused by ocean bottom currents. We will present an initial analysis of the seasonal evolution of the ambient seismic noise that will help to discriminate noise sources and evaluate the potential of such records to monitor the state of the sea ice cover.</p>


2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (B12) ◽  
pp. 30689-30699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Katsumata ◽  
Toshinori Sato ◽  
Junzo Kasahara ◽  
Naoshi Hirata ◽  
Ryota Hino ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 379-393
Author(s):  
A. A. Krylov ◽  
A. I. Ivashchenko ◽  
S. A. Kovachev ◽  
N. V. Tsukanov ◽  
M. E. Kulikov ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 1101-1114
Author(s):  
Jerry A. Carter ◽  
Noel Barstow ◽  
Paul W. Pomeroy ◽  
Eric P. Chael ◽  
Patrick J. Leahy

Abstract Evidence is presented supporting the view that high-frequency seismic noise decreases with increased depth. Noise amplitudes are higher near the free surface where surface-wave noise, cultural noise, and natural (wind-induced) noise predominate. Data were gathered at a hard-rock site in the northwestern Adirondack lowlands of northern New York. Between 15- and 40-Hz noise levels at this site are more than 10 dB less at 945-m depth than they are at the surface, and from 40 to 100 Hz the difference is more than 20 dB. In addition, time variability of the spectra is shown to be greater at the surface than at either 335- or 945-m depths. Part of the difference between the surface and subsurface noise variability may be related to wind-induced noise. Coherency measurements between orthogonal components of motion show high-frequency seismic noise is more highly organized at the surface than it is at depth. Coherency measurements between the same component of motion at different vertical offsets show a strong low-frequency coherence at least up to 945-m vertical offsets. As the vertical offset decreases, the frequency band of high coherence increases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document