scholarly journals Mangroves as a Source of Greenhouse Gases to the Atmosphere and Alkalinity and Dissolved Carbon to the Coastal Ocean: A Case Study From the Everglades National Park, Florida

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria M. S. Reithmaier ◽  
David T. Ho ◽  
Scott G. Johnston ◽  
Damien T. Maher
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Reithmaier ◽  
David Ho ◽  
Scott Johnston ◽  
Damien Maher

<p>Most research evaluating the potential of mangroves as a sink for atmospheric carbon has focused on carbon burial. However, the few studies that have quantified lateral exchange of carbon and alkalinity, indicate that the dissolved carbon and alkalinity export may be several-fold more important than burial. This study aims to investigate rates and drivers of alkalinity, dissolved carbon and greenhouse gas fluxes of the mangrove-dominated Shark River estuary located in the Everglades National Park in Florida, USA. Time series and spatial surveys were conducted to asses total alkalinity (TAlk), organic alkalinity (OAlk), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). Dominant metabolic processes driving dissolved carbon and greenhouse gas dynamics varied along the estuary salinity gradient. Dissolved carbon and greenhouse gas concentrations were strongly coupled to porewater input, which was examined using Rn-222. Shark River was a source of CO<sub>2</sub> (92 mmol/m<sup>­2</sup>/d), CH<sub>4</sub> (60 µmol/m<sup>­2</sup>/d) and N<sub>2</sub>O (2 µmol/m­<sup>2</sup>/d) to the atmosphere. Dissolved carbon export (DIC = 142 mmol/m­<sup>2</sup>/d, DOC = 39 mmol/m­<sup>2</sup>/d) was several-fold higher than burial (~28 mmol/m<sup>2</sup>/d) and represents an additional carbon sink. Furthermore, the estuary was a source of TAlk (97 mmol/m­<sup>2</sup>/d) to the coastal ocean, potentially buffering coastal acidification. Despite accounting for only a small share of TAlk, OAlk had a large effect on the estuarine pH. By integrating our results with previous studies, we argue that alkalinity, dissolved carbon and greenhouse gas fluxes should be considered in future blue carbon budgets.</p>


2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Slocum ◽  
William J. Platt ◽  
Brian Beckage ◽  
Bob Panko ◽  
James B. Lushine

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Miriam R. Aczel ◽  
Karen E. Makuch

This case study analyzes the potential impacts of weakening the National Park Service’s (NPS) “9B Regulations” enacted in 1978, which established a federal regulatory framework governing hydrocarbon rights and extraction to protect natural resources within the parks. We focus on potential risks to national parklands resulting from Executive Orders 13771—Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs [1]—and 13783—Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth [2]—and subsequent recent revisions and further deregulation. To establish context, we briefly overview the history of the United States NPS and other relevant federal agencies’ roles and responsibilities in protecting federal lands that have been set aside due to their value as areas of natural beauty or historical or cultural significance [3]. We present a case study of Theodore Roosevelt National Park (TRNP) situated within the Bakken Shale Formation—a lucrative region of oil and gas deposits—to examine potential impacts if areas of TRNP, particularly areas designated as “wilderness,” are opened to resource extraction, or if the development in other areas of the Bakken near or adjacent to the park’s boundaries expands [4]. We have chosen TRNP because of its biodiversity and rich environmental resources and location in the hydrocarbon-rich Bakken Shale. We discuss where federal agencies’ responsibility for the protection of these lands for future generations and their responsibility for oversight of mineral and petroleum resources development by private contractors have the potential for conflict.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-172
Author(s):  
Yun-Jin Shim ◽  
Yong-Su Park ◽  
Rae-Ha Jang ◽  
Young-Jun Yoon ◽  
Sun- Ryoung Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document