Solar wind electron temperature depressions following some interplanetary shock waves: Evidence for magnetic merging?

1974 ◽  
Vol 79 (22) ◽  
pp. 3103-3110 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Montgomery ◽  
J. R. Asbridge ◽  
S. J. Bame ◽  
W. C. Feldman
1974 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 377-381
Author(s):  
M. Dryer ◽  
A. Eviatar ◽  
A. Frohlich ◽  
A. Jacobs ◽  
J. H. Joseph ◽  
...  

(J. Geophys. Res.). The August 1972 events provided an excellent opportunity for synthesizing a variety of observations in a coordinated fashion for the purpose of improving flare-shock associations, and our understanding of interplanetary shock propagation and solar wind interaction with planets and comets. These observations included the usual sudden commencements of magnetic storms at Earth; preliminary shock data from Heos-2, Prognoz-1 and Prognoz-2 (at Earth) and the radially-aligned Pioneers 9 (0.77 AU) and 10 (2.2 AU) located about 45° east of the Sun–Earth axis; solar radio types II and IV (as reported in World Data Center A's UAG Report 28, 1973, and this Symposium); discrete radio source scintillations in the solar wind; and the more speculative ideas regarding the solar wind's interaction with planets and comets. In the last case, Jupiter and Comet P/Schwassmann-Wachmann I exhibited non-Io-associated radio emission and a brightness increase, respectively, as a possible result of shock waves from the flare and/or coronal ejection activity initiated on 1972 June 15. During the August events, Comet P/Giacobini-Zinner exhibited statistically-significant sudden brightness decrease following its perihelion on 1972 August 4 at 1 AU approximately 57° west of the Sun–Earth axis.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (S286) ◽  
pp. 159-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Corona-Romero ◽  
J. A. Gonzalez-Esparza

AbstractWe present a study about the propagation of interplanetary shock waves driven by super magnetosonic coronal mass ejections (CMEs). The discussion focuses on a model which describes the dynamic relationship between the CME and its driven shock and the way to approximate the trajectory of shocks based on those relationships, from near the Sun to 1 AU. We apply the model to the analysis of a case study in which our calculations show quantitative and qualitative agreements with different kinds of data. We discuss the importance of solar wind and CME initial conditions on the shock wave evolution.


2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 1471-1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Maksimovic ◽  
K. Issautier ◽  
N. Meyer-Vernet ◽  
C. Perche ◽  
M. Moncuquet ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 609-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. J. Huttunen ◽  
J. Slavin ◽  
M. Collier ◽  
H. E. J. Koskinen ◽  
A. Szabo ◽  
...  

Abstract. Sudden impulses (SI) in the tail lobe magnetic field associated with solar wind pressure enhancements are investigated using measurements from Cluster. The magnetic field components during the SIs change in a manner consistent with the assumption that an antisunward moving lateral pressure enhancement compresses the magnetotail axisymmetrically. We found that the maximum variance SI unit vectors were nearly aligned with the associated interplanetary shock normals. For two of the tail lobe SI events during which Cluster was located close to the tail boundary, Cluster observed the inward moving magnetopause. During both events, the spacecraft location changed from the lobe to the magnetospheric boundary layer. During the event on 6 November 2001 the magnetopause was compressed past Cluster. We applied the 2-D Cartesian model developed by collier98 in which a vacuum uniform tail lobe magnetic field is compressed by a step-like pressure increase. The model underestimates the compression of the magnetic field, but it fits the magnetic field maximum variance component well. For events for which we could determine the shock normal orientation, the differences between the observed and calculated shock propagation times from the location of WIND/Geotail to the location of Cluster were small. The propagation speeds of the SIs between the Cluster spacecraft were comparable to the solar wind speed. Our results suggest that the observed tail lobe SIs are due to lateral increases in solar wind dynamic pressure outside the magnetotail boundary.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document