Sorting of Bed Load Sediment by Flow in Meander Bends

1985 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1361-1373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Parker ◽  
E. D. Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Bed Load ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Zhijing ◽  
Li Dazhi ◽  
Liu Xiaobin ◽  
Jin Zhongwu ◽  
Chen Dasong

2001 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 2227-2241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Paul Meakin ◽  
Torstein Jøssang

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 153-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Schmitt ◽  
V. Milisic ◽  
J.-L. Bertrand-Krajewski ◽  
D. Laplace ◽  
G. Chebbo

A model with density currents has been developed and tested to simulate bed load sediment traps. In this model, the bed load layer over the pipe invert is considered as a continuous layer characterised by a density and a viscosity which depends on the solid concentration. A set of equations has been established that describes the trapping of the bed load material as the dynamics of two non-miscible fluids over and in the bed load sediment trap. The Fluent package has been used and adapted to solve the equations of the model. The VOF method (Volume Of Fluid) has been chosen to solve the two phase approach according to a Euler-Euler scheme. Several series of simulations have been carried out in order to assess the influence of the slot position and trap design on efficiency. The results obtained agree with previous empirical findings, and allow confirmation (in a more reliable manner than before) that the best sediment trap design involves a centrally-placed slot with the two plates covering the trap reservoir placed at the same height as one another.


2015 ◽  
Vol 120 (11) ◽  
pp. 2298-2317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan L. Fathel ◽  
David Jon Furbish ◽  
Mark W. Schmeeckle

1990 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. C. Phillips ◽  
A. J. Sutherland

Soil Research ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
RJ Loch ◽  
TE Donnollan

Size distributions of the solids in runoff water were measured for two clay soils subjected to simulated rain under a range of plot lengths and two tillage orientations. Selective transport did not appear to have affected the sediment size distributions. Therefore, these could be used as a measure of soil structure and aggregate breakdown by rainfall and runoff. There was little dispersed clay, most of the sediment remaining aggregated. For each soil, sediment size distributions were bimodal, peaks in sediment size being related to orders of aggregation in each soil. Concentrations of dispersed clay provide evidence that stresses on aggregates moved by rain impact on flowing water were greater than on those moved in rills by flowing water alone. Consistent with this, sediment size distributions showed much less breakdown to sizes <0.125 mm in rills. Suspended load (sediment < 20 �m) showed little temporal fluctuation, and little or no decrease with time, suggesting that for these soils, aggregate disruption by raindrops and overland flow provides a continuous source of suspendable material. Bed-load was more variable and saltating and contact load appeared to be complementary to some extent. Large differences between the two soils in measured sediment concentrations could not be explained by slight differences in sediment size. However, large differences between the soils in the water content and density of saturated aggregates were found. Transport equations for bed-load sediment suggest that the measured difference in aggregate density is sufficient to explain the difference between the soils in rates of sediment transport.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document