Preschool Screening: To Refer or Not? That Is the Question (Or Is It?)

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 565-566
Author(s):  
Richard Lehrer
Keyword(s):  
1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
Brenda Dawson ◽  
Nowell D. Bryant

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond P. Lorion ◽  
William F. Barker ◽  
Janet Cahill ◽  
Richard Gallagher ◽  
William A. Passons ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah R. Richardson ◽  
Charlotte M. Wright ◽  
Susan Hrisos ◽  
Deborah Buck ◽  
Michael P. Clarke

1977 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire B. Ernhart ◽  
Steven D. Spaner ◽  
Thomas E. Jordan

1981 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 1231-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Obrzut ◽  
David N. Bolocofsky ◽  
Charles P. Heath ◽  
Marilyn J. Jones

This study investigated the validity of the Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning (DIAL) for the prediction of school success. Fifty-three kindergarten children ranging in age from 55 months to 71 months were pre-screened with the DIAL five months prior to school entrance and then administered the Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT), Metropolitan Readiness Test (MRT), and a Progress Report form during the end of the academic year. Canonical correlations and stepwise multiple linear regression analyses indicated that the DIAL Communications subtest was the most valid single predictor of school success as determined by the composite MRT. The DIAL Concepts subtest was the only significant predictor of Progress Report composite score. Implications of these results are discussed in terms of preschool screening programs and the use of the DIAL.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celia Hsiao ◽  
Linda M. Richter

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 271-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terri Schellinger ◽  
Joe Beer ◽  
John Beer

42 children, brought for preschool screening from rural north central Kansas school districts, were administered the concepts area of the Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning—Revised, and after the children had started school, the SRA scores were collected from their files. The 20 boys were absent more often than the 22 girls during Kindergarten. There was no sex difference on the concepts area of the DIAL—R. In Grade 1 girls had higher SRA Composite scores. The scores on the DIAL—R concepts area correlated (.36 to .68) with Kindergarten SRA scores and Grade 1 SRA scores, in part, because the DIAL—R concepts area covers the material presented and learned in Kindergarten and screens for material presented in Grade 1. Screening devices may be a useful first step in developing comprehensive assessment plans for children.


1988 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Simon ◽  
Carrie Larson ◽  
Richard Lehrer
Keyword(s):  

BMJ ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 305 (6846) ◽  
pp. 181-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Kaul ◽  
D. P. Roberts
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document