scholarly journals Society of Pediatric Psychology Workforce Survey: Development of survey methods, sample characteristics, and lessons learned.

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Wysocki ◽  
Cheryl L. Brosig ◽  
Marisa E. Hilliard
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl L. Brosig ◽  
Marisa E. Hilliard ◽  
Andre Williams ◽  
F. Daniel Armstrong ◽  
Peggy Christidis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-407
Author(s):  
Stephanie Chopko ◽  
Susan Klostermann ◽  
Margaret Veloski ◽  
Colleen Sherman ◽  
Roger Harrison ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eve-Lynn Nelson ◽  
Susana Patton ◽  
Ann Davis ◽  
Shawna Wright ◽  
Noreen Thompson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Schumm

Some of the advantages and the pitfalls of planning and conducting military family research are discussed.  Family theory remains critical to research on military families but needs to be combined with detailed knowledge of the issues faced by military families.  The military’s concerns about family privacy can lead to tensions with the researcher’s need to define population and sample characteristics, as well as to obtain high response rates through systematic follow-up of potential survey respondents.  Researchers may find an easier path to publication for research that sounds like “good news”, while research that seems like “bad news” may be suppressed, disguised, or managed in a variety of ways.  Because of the complexities of military life and military family life it may be very useful to bring military personnel or veterans into your research group when developing and testing theories about military family life.   


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Wysocki ◽  
Cheryl L. Brosig ◽  
Marisa E. Hilliard

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 882-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Hilliard ◽  
M. M. Ernst ◽  
W. N. Gray ◽  
S. A. Saeed ◽  
S. Cortina

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann C. Miller ◽  
Peter Rohloff ◽  
Alexandre Blake ◽  
Eloin Dhaenens ◽  
Leah Shaw ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Population-representative household survey methods require up-to-date sampling frames and sample designs that minimize time and cost of fieldwork especially in low- and middle-income countries. Traditional methods such as multi-stage cluster sampling, random-walk, or spatial sampling can be cumbersome, costly or inaccurate, leading to well-known biases. However, a new tool, Epicentre’s Geo-Sampler program, allows simple random sampling of structures, which can eliminate some of these biases. We describe the study design process, experiences and lessons learned using Geo-Sampler for selection of a population representative sample for a kidney disease survey in two sites in Guatemala. Results We successfully used Epicentre’s Geo-sampler tool to sample 650 structures in two semi-urban Guatemalan communities. Overall, 82% of sampled structures were residential and could be approached for recruitment. Sample selection could be conducted by one person after 30 min of training. The process from sample selection to creating field maps took approximately 40 h. Conclusion In combination with our design protocols, the Epicentre Geo-Sampler tool provided a feasible, rapid and lower-cost alternative to select a representative population sample for a prevalence survey in our semi-urban Guatemalan setting. The tool may work less well in settings with heavy arboreal cover or densely populated urban settings with multiple living units per structure. Similarly, while the method is an efficient step forward for including non-traditional living arrangements (people residing permanently or temporarily in businesses, religious institutions or other structures), it does not account for some of the most marginalized and vulnerable people in a population–the unhoused, street dwellers or people living in vehicles.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann C Miller ◽  
Peter Rohloff ◽  
Alexandre Blake ◽  
Eloin Dhaenens ◽  
Leah Shaw ◽  
...  

Background: Population-representative household survey methods require up-to-date sampling frames and sample designs that minimize time and cost of fieldwork especially in low- and middle-income countries. Traditional methods such as multi-stage cluster sampling, random-walk, or spatial sampling can be cumbersome, costly or inaccurate, leading to well-known biases. However, a new tool, Epicentre's Geo-Sampler program, allows simple random sampling of structures, which can eliminate some of these biases. We describe the study design process, experiences and lessons learned using Geo-Sampler for selection of a population representative sample for a kidney disease survey in two sites in Guatemala. Results: We successfully used Epicentre's Geo-sampler tool to sample 650 structures in two semi-urban Guatemalan communities. Overall, 82% of sampled structures were residential and could be approached for recruitment. Sample selection could be conducted by one person after 30 minutes of training. The process from sample selection to creating field maps took approximately 40 hours. Conclusion: In combination with our design protocols, the Epicentre Geo-Sampler tool provided a feasible, rapid and lower-cost alternative to select a representative population sample for a prevalence survey in our semi-urban Guatemalan setting. The tool may work less well in settings with heavy arboreal cover or densely populated urban settings with multiple living units per structure. Similarly, while the method is an efficient step forward for including non-traditional living arrangements (people residing permanently or temporarily in businesses, religious institutions or other structures), it does not account for some of the most marginalized and vulnerable people in a population--the unhoused, street dwellers or people living in vehicles.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 461-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa E. Hilliard ◽  
Cheryl Brosig ◽  
Andre A. A. Williams ◽  
Jessica Valenzuela ◽  
Astrida Kaugars ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-96
Author(s):  
Mary R. T. Kennedy

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to provide speech-language pathologists with a brief update of the evidence that provides possible explanations for our experiences while coaching college students with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Method The narrative text provides readers with lessons we learned as speech-language pathologists functioning as cognitive coaches to college students with TBI. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list, but rather to consider the recent scientific evidence that will help our understanding of how best to coach these college students. Conclusion Four lessons are described. Lesson 1 focuses on the value of self-reported responses to surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. Lesson 2 addresses the use of immediate/proximal goals as leverage for students to update their sense of self and how their abilities and disabilities may alter their more distal goals. Lesson 3 reminds us that teamwork is necessary to address the complex issues facing these students, which include their developmental stage, the sudden onset of trauma to the brain, and having to navigate going to college with a TBI. Lesson 4 focuses on the need for college students with TBI to learn how to self-advocate with instructors, family, and peers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document