Alaska school and child care facility immunization manual

2002 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thalia Dragonas ◽  
John Tsiantis ◽  
Anna Lambidi

The Child Care Facility Schedule (CCFS) represents an effort to develop a measure to assess quality child care. Initially 80 criteria, covering 8 areas considered important for attaining quality, were defined. These were subsequently tested in three different cultural contexts: Athens (Greece), Manila (Philippines), and Ibadan (Nigeria). Reliability studies were conducted in Athens and Ibadan, and a validity study was carried out in Athens. Concurrent validity was established by comparing the CCFS scores with those obtained from an unstructured observation by an observer unfamiliar with the content of the Schedule. Criterion validity was examined by comparing the CCFS scores with those derived from another well-established measure. Factor and cluster analyses were used as a means for establishing construct validity. A general quality factor that tapped the contribution of the caretakers to quality was revealed, and a shorter 43-item version was recommended. The CCFS appears to identify differences among the various types of day care centres, and can be used for self-evaluation by the personnel of day care centres.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-385
Author(s):  
Jay E. Berkelhamer ◽  
Janis Mendelsohn ◽  
John D. Madden

Since effective education of medical students in general pediatric clinics has been the subject of much review lately,1-6 a survey of the General Pediatric Clinic of the University of Chicago was conducted. Medical students and patients appeared to be satisfied with their experience in our clinic. The clinic is a primary care facility where patients are seen on a nonreferral basis. Approximately 70% of the 12,000 patient visits per year are for continuous well child care.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-243
Author(s):  
Susan S. Aronson

Standards for child care settings define expected performance. Other types of requirements applicable to operation of child care facilities include funding requirements, accreditation criteria, and regulations (legal requirements). During licensing inspections, program monitoring by funding agencies, evaluations by accrediting organizations, and self-evaluations, programs become aware of opportunities for improvement. The process of evaluation alone leads to improved program performance1; the majority of providers want to do a good job. When requirements are used for systematic surveillance, the compliance data generated identify problems to be targeted for quality improvement. Training, technical assistance, linkage to existing resources, and development of new resources are common interventions that lead to improved performance in child care programs. These interventions may be applied at the level of an individual child care facility or at any level involved with child care services. Thus, training and technical assistance may be given to caregivers, to licensors, to policy makers, or to the public. A surveillance system should continuously measure the impact of interventions and focus attention on problems that require further corrective action. When performance data from individual programs are aggregated, they provide powerful tools to assess the need for communitywide interventions. Some changes cannot be accomplished within the limited resources of an individual child care facility. Sometimes program improvement requires one or more types of intervention at the community, regional, state, and/or national level. Updating requirements, conducting surveillance to measure compliance with requirements, and analyzing data to target interventions and measure the impact of actions on program performance are the basic elements of a systems model for improving quality in child care (see Figure).


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 1469-1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Clark ◽  
Jennifer K. Henk ◽  
Philip G. Crandall ◽  
Mardel A. Crandall ◽  
Corliss A. O'Bryan

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kylie A. Hodgkins ◽  
Frances R. Crawford ◽  
William R. Budiselik

This paper describes the collaboration between an Aboriginal community and Western Australia's (WA) Department for Child Protection (DCP) in designing and operating a residential child care facility in a predominantly Aboriginal community. Research literature has established that the effective operation of child protection systems in remote Aboriginal communities requires practitioners and policy-makers to have awareness of local and extra-local cultural, historical and contemporary social factors in nurturing children. This ethnographic case study describes how a newspaper campaign heightened public and professional awareness of child abuse in the town of Halls Creek, in WA's Kimberley region. With its largely Aboriginal population, Halls Creek lacked the infrastructure to accommodate an inflow of regional people. Homelessness, neglect and poverty were widespread. Within a broader government and local response, DCP joined with community leaders to plan out of home care for children. Detailed are the importance and complexities of negotiating between universal standardised models of care and local input. Strategies for building positive relationships with children's family while strengthening both parenting capacity and community acceptance, and use of the facility are identified. Key to success was the development of a collaborative ‘third-space’ for threading together local and professional child protection knowledge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document