Interactions Between Prospective Memory and Working Memory Loads?

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcella Ferrari ◽  
Silvia Zocchi ◽  
Demis Basso ◽  
Paola Palladino
PsyCh Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya Wang ◽  
Xiao-yan Cao ◽  
Ji-fang Cui ◽  
David H. K. Shum ◽  
Raymond C. K. Chan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hunter Ball ◽  
Philip Peper ◽  
Durna Alakbarova ◽  
Sam Gilbert ◽  
Gene Arnold Brewer

The current study examined whether offloading prospective memory (PM) demands onto the environment through the use of reminders eliminates PM differences typically seen between individuals that have poor or good working memory ability. Over two laboratory sessions scheduled one week apart, participants completed three versions of a PM offloading task with and without the use of reminders, along with multiple measures of working memory. Participants also generated a list of naturalistic intentions to fulfill between sessions and were given an intention to email the experimenter every day. They later indicated which intentions were completed with and without the use of reminders. Consistent with prior research, high working memory participants did better in both laboratory and naturalistic settings when having to rely on their own memory. Critically, however, working memory ability was no longer predictive of performance with the use of reminders. Participants with lower working memory also offloaded more often that high ability participants, but this was not optimally calibrated to actual PM performance. These findings suggest that offloading may be particularly beneficial for those with poor cognitive ability. The theoretical and applied ramifications of these findings are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 130 (8) ◽  
pp. 834-840
Author(s):  
Giulia Fronda ◽  
Cecilia Monti ◽  
Matteo Sozzi ◽  
Massimo Corbo ◽  
Michela Balconi

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 569-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia S. Bisiacchi ◽  
Vincenza Tarantino ◽  
Alessia Ciccola

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan S. Rose ◽  
Peter G. Rendell ◽  
Mark A. McDaniel ◽  
Ingo Aberle ◽  
Matthias Kliegel

2016 ◽  
Vol 371 (1708) ◽  
pp. 20160005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Umeda ◽  
Saiko Tochizawa ◽  
Midori Shibata ◽  
Yuri Terasawa

Previous studies on prospective memory (PM), defined as memory for future intentions, suggest that psychological stress enhances successful PM retrieval. However, the mechanisms underlying this notion remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that PM retrieval is achieved through interaction with autonomic nervous activity, which is mediated by the individual accuracy of interoceptive awareness, as measured by the heartbeat detection task. In this study, the relationship between cardiac reactivity and retrieval of delayed intentions was evaluated using the event-based PM task. Participants were required to detect PM target letters while engaged in an ongoing 2-back working memory task. The results demonstrated that individuals with higher PM task performance had a greater increase in heart rate on PM target presentation. Also, higher interoceptive perceivers showed better PM task performance. This pattern was not observed for working memory task performance. These findings suggest that cardiac afferent signals enhance PM retrieval, which is mediated by individual levels of interoceptive accuracy. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document