Ageism in Personnel Selection Decisions: A Prejudice-Reduction Intervention

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Marcus ◽  
Barbara A. Fritzsche
2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 2752-2761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward H. Chang ◽  
Erika L. Kirgios ◽  
Aneesh Rai ◽  
Katherine L. Milkman

We highlight a feature of personnel selection decisions that can influence the gender diversity of groups and teams. Specifically, we show that people are less likely to choose candidates whose gender would increase group diversity when making personnel selections in isolation (i.e., when they are responsible for selecting a single group member) than when making collections of choices (i.e., when they are responsible for selecting multiple group members). We call this the isolated choice effect. Across six preregistered experiments (n = 3,509), we demonstrate that the isolated choice effect has important consequences for group diversity. When making sets of hiring and selection decisions (as opposed to making a single hire), people construct more gender-diverse groups. Mediation and moderation studies suggest that people do not attend as much to diversity when making isolated selection choices, which drives this effect. This paper was accepted by Yuval Rottenstreich, decision analysis.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Hanafiah Ahmad ◽  
Gusman Nawanir ◽  
Mohd Rashid Ab Hamid

The purpose of personnel selection is to measure knowledge, skills, and abilities that are necessary to perform a job effectively. The process involves various assessments, including personality assessment. This conceptual paper discussed the potential of using a learning factory to develop multiple simulations for assessment center activities in assessing personality in different situations. Although traditional personality assessment contributes to the effectiveness of selection decisions and prediction, it tended to ignore that trait-related behaviors may differ across situations. Study on dynamic personality is essential as empirical studies showed that within-person fluctuations in personality states relate to a variety of work outcomes, including job performance. To further understand this fundamental issue, this paper discussed further how personality–situation interplay influences performance by using a learning factory assessment center method. This study also discussed how the adaptation of exploratory mixed methods approach could be used. The mixed exploratory methods are suitable as this topic is related to fundamental research and empirical study, besides the investigation on this area is still limited. This paper could benefit other researchers, industry players, and policymakers in understanding better how dynamic personality may influence performance, especially in the activities related to Industry 4.0.


2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 (138) ◽  
pp. 67-83
Author(s):  
Lorin M. Mueller ◽  
Eric M. Dunleavy ◽  
Ash K. Buonasera

1970 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 959-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Griffitt ◽  
Thomas Jackson

The influences on simulated personnel selection decisions of a job applicant's intellectual ability and the degree to which his opinions agreed with those of an evaluator were investigated in a factorial experiment using 78 undergraduates. Both variables significantly ( p < .01) influenced recommendations to hire or not hire the applicant. The results were discussed with respect to the influence of valid and invalid job-success predictors on selection decisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 172-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jisoo Ock ◽  
Frederick L. Oswald

Abstract. Compensatory selection is generally more reliable than multiple-hurdle selection. Yet, practitioners may lean toward multiple-hurdle models, because administering an entire predictor battery to every applicant can be time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we considered some specific cases to illustrate, in terms of selection utility and the cost-reliability tradeoff between compensatory and multiple-hurdle selection models. Results showed that compensatory model selection produced a higher level of expected criterion performance in the selected applicant subgroup, and a higher overall selection utility in most conditions. The simulation provides researchers and practitioners with a practical illustration of the tradeoff between reliable (compensatory) versus cost-efficient (multiple-hurdle) selection models – one that can inspire the exploration of other scenarios and tradeoffs.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerel E. Slaughter ◽  
Jessica Bagger ◽  
Andrew Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document