ERP Signature of Interference Resolution Predicts Individual Difference in Working Memory

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Zhou ◽  
Lindsay Meredith ◽  
Robin Thomas
2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Schreppel ◽  
Johanna Egetemeir ◽  
Martin Schecklmann ◽  
Michael M. Plichta ◽  
Paul Pauli ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2790-2803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara M. Levens ◽  
Elizabeth A. Phelps

Previous research has shown that emotional information aids conflict resolution in working memory [WM; Levens, S. M., & Phelps, E. A. Emotion processing effects on interference resolution in working memory. Journal of Emotion, 8, 267–280, 2008]. Using a recency-probes WM paradigm, it was found that positive and negative emotional stimuli reduced the amount of interference created when information that was once relevant conflicted with currently relevant information. To explore the neural mechanisms behind these facilitation effects, an event-related fMRI version of the recency-probes task was conducted using neutral and arousing positive and negative words as stimuli. Results replicate previous findings showing that the left and right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is involved in the interference resolution of neutral information and reveal that the IFG is involved in the interference resolution of emotional information as well. In addition, ROIs in the right and left anterior insula and in the right orbital frontal cortex (OFC) were identified that appear to underlie emotional interference resolution in WM. We conclude that the IFG underlies neutral and emotional interference resolution, and that additional regions of the anterior insula and OFC may contribute to the facilitation of interference resolution for emotional information. These findings clarify the role of the insula and OFC in affective and executive processing, specifically in WM conflict resolution.


2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 995-1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN G. KERNS

Background. Although communication disturbances (CD) have been associated with poor cognitive control, it is unclear whether they are associated specifically with poor cognitive control or with poor cognition in general. The current research examined whether (a) two specific components of cognitive control, working memory and interference resolution, were associated with CD, and (b) associations between CD and cognitive control could be accounted for by generalized poor cognitive performance.Method. In this study, as healthy volunteers spoke, the level of cognitive demands was experimentally increased, thereby simulating cognitive deficits (i.e. a reduction in the degree to which certain types of cognitive processes could be used for speech). Hence, this research examined whether simulated cognitive deficits would cause an increase in CD. Participants also completed separate cognitive tasks that assessed working memory, interference resolution and general cognitive ability.Results. An increase in working memory demands caused an increase in CD. Moreover, working memory demands interacted with interference resolution demands, with the greatest amount of CD caused by both high working memory and high interference resolution demands. By contrast, increasing another cognitive demand, sustained attention, did not increase CD. Furthermore, performance on separate working memory and interference resolution tasks interacted to predict CD on the experimental speech task. However, performance on a psychometrically matched cognitive task did not predict CD.Conclusion. Overall, the current study provides evidence that working memory and interference resolution may be specifically associated with CD and that manipulations of these cognitive control processes can cause an increase in CD.


NeuroImage ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. S420 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Glahn ◽  
Theo Van Erp ◽  
Nicole Hill ◽  
John Haselgrove ◽  
Tyrone Cannon

2008 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingchun Du ◽  
Zhuangwei Xiao ◽  
Yan Song ◽  
Silu Fan ◽  
Renhua Wu ◽  
...  

Emotion ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara M. Levens ◽  
Elizabeth A. Phelps

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document