Developments in Trials of CBT for Adolescent Depression: A Meta-Analysis

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse B. Klein ◽  
Rachel H. Jacobs ◽  
Mark A. Reinecke
2019 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 928-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Finning ◽  
Obioha C Ukoumunne ◽  
Tamsin Ford ◽  
Emilia Danielsson-Waters ◽  
Liz Shaw ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 197 (6) ◽  
pp. 433-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadka Dubicka ◽  
Rachel Elvins ◽  
Chris Roberts ◽  
Greg Chick ◽  
Paul Wilkinson ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe treatment of adolescent depression is controversial and studies of combined treatment (antidepressants and cognitive–behavioural therapy, CBT) have produced conflicting findings.AimsTo address the question of whether CBT confers additional benefit to antidepressant treatment in adolescents with unipolar depression for depressive symptoms, suicidality, impairment and global improvement.MethodMeta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of newer-generation antidepressants and CBT in adolescent depression.ResultsThere was no evidence of a statistically significant benefit of combined treatment over antidepressants for depressive symptoms, suicidality and global improvement after acute treatment or at follow-up. There was a statistically significant advantage of combined treatment for impairment in the short-term (at 12 weeks) only. There was some evidence of heterogeneity between studies.ConclusionsAdding CBT to antidepressants confers limited advantage for the treatment of an episode of depression in adolescents. The variation in sampling and methodology between studies, as well as the small number of trials, limits the generalisability of the findings and any conclusions that can be drawn. Future studies should examine predictors of response to treatment as well as clinical components that may affect outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Wenliang Liu ◽  
Gongying Li ◽  
Congjie Wang ◽  
Xiuzhen Wang ◽  
Lin Yang

Objective. The efficacy of antidepressant drugs combined with psychotherapy is controversial; hence, this meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of the combination therapy. Methods. Relevant literature was searched in PubMed, Web of Science and Embase, Chinese databases CNKI, and WanFang Data. We included the literature on the comparison of the sertraline combined with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and each treatment alone for adolescent depression published in 2000-2021. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata16.0 software. Results. A total of 421 relevant articles were retrieved, and 14 studies were finally included. In comparison with the control group (sertraline), sertraline combined with CBT achieved higher response rate ( OR = 5.07 , 95% CI: 3.00, 8.58) and lower incidence of adverse reactions ( OR = 0.43 , 95% CI: 0.24, 0.75). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in depression score, anxiety score, and symptom self-rating scale score between the two groups. After treatment, depression score ( SMD = − 2.79 , 95% CI: -3.64, -1.94), anxiety score ( SMD = − 1.22 , 95% CI: -1.96, -0.47), and symptom self-rating scale score ( SMD = − 1.73 , 95% CI: -3.19, -0.27) were significantly lower in the combined treatment group than in the control group. Conclusion. Although the number of comparative trials is small, this study shows that sertraline is effective for adolescent depression, but sertraline combined with CBT is more effective. The latter can significantly reduce the incidence of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and adverse reactions in patients. Therefore, this combination therapy is recommended for the clinical treatment of adolescent depression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document