Mechanisms of Eyewitness Suggestibility: A Test of the Explanatory Role Hypothesis

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Rindal ◽  
Quin M. Chrobak ◽  
Maria Zaragoza ◽  
Caitlin Weihing
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1413-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Rindal ◽  
Quin M. Chrobak ◽  
Maria S. Zaragoza ◽  
Caitlin A. Weihing

Memory ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Blair E. Braun ◽  
Maria S. Zaragoza ◽  
Quin M. Chrobak ◽  
Jaruda Ithisuphalap

Author(s):  
Nicholas Shea

The varitel accounts of content allow us to see how the practice of representational explanation works and why content has an explanatory role to play. They establish the causal-explanatory relevance of semantic properties and are neutral about causal efficacy. Exploitable relations give the accounts an advantage over views based only on outputs. Content does valuable explanatory work in areas beyond psychology, but it need not be explanatorily valuable in every case. The varitel accounts illuminate why there should be a tight connection between content and the circumstances in which a representation develops. The accounts have some epistemological consequences. Representations at the personal level are different in a variety of ways that are relevant to content determination. Naturalizing personal-level content thus becomes a tractable research programme. Most importantly, varitel semantics offers a naturalistic account of the content of representations in the brain and other subpersonal representational systems.


Author(s):  
Susanna Schellenberg

Chapter 5 takes a step back and traces the way in which excessive demands on the notion of perceptual content invite an austere relationalist account of perception. It argues that any account that acknowledges the role of discriminatory, selective capacities in perception must acknowledge that perceptual states have representational content. The chapter shows that on a relational understanding of perceptual content, the fundamental insights of austere relationalism do not compete with representationalism. Most objections to the thesis that perceptual experience has representational content apply only to austere representationalist accounts, that is, accounts on which perceptual relations to the environment play no explanatory role. By arguing that perceptual relations and perceptual content are mutually dependent the chapter shows how Fregean particularism can avoid the pitfalls of both austere representationalism and austere relationalism. With relationalists, Fregean particularism argues that perception is constitutively relational, but with representationalists it argues that it is constitutively representational.


Ethics ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-186
Author(s):  
Alexander Rosenberg

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason C.K. Chan ◽  
Ayanna K. Thomas ◽  
John B. Bulevich

Human Studies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Trigg

AbstractPhenomenologically grounded research on pregnancy is a thriving area of activity in feminist studies and related disciplines. But what has been largely omitted in this area of research is the experience of childbirth itself. This paper proposes a phenomenological analysis of childbirth inspired by the work of Merleau-Ponty. The paper proceeds from the conviction that the concept of anonymity can play a critical role in explicating the affective structure of childbirth. This is evident in at least two respects. First, the concept of anonymity gives structural specificity to the different levels of bodily existence at work in childbirth. Second, the concept of anonymity can play a powerful explanatory role in accounting for the sense of strangeness accompanying childbirth. To flesh these ideas out, I focus on two attributes of birth, sourced from first-person narratives of childbirth. The first aspect concerns the sense of leaving one’s body behind during childbirth while the second aspect concerns the sense of strangeness accompanying the first encounter with the baby upon successful delivery. I take both of these aspects of childbirth seriously, treating them as being instructive not only of the uniqueness of childbirth but also revealing something important about bodily life more generally. Accordingly, the paper unfolds in three stages. First, I will critically explore the concept of anonymity in Merleau-Ponty; second, I will apply this concept to childbirth; finally, I will provide an outline of how childbirth sheds light on the broader nature of bodily life.


2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 940-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Lane ◽  
Mara Mather ◽  
Diane Villa ◽  
Shelby K. Morita

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 617-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn E Holliday ◽  
Brett K Hayes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document