Test Development and Validation Viewed As Mixed-Methods Research

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A. Markus
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Test Development ◽  
Development And Validation

Rubric Development and Validation for Assessing Comprehensive Internationalization in Higher Education

2019 ◽  
pp. 102831531986579
Author(s):  
Melissa K. Mace ◽  
Denise Pearl
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Institutional Assessment ◽  
Minimum Score ◽  
Rubric Development ◽  
Internationalization In Higher Education ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Validation Research ◽  
Comprehensive Internationalization

The purpose of this study was to determine if the Institutional Assessment Rubric on Comprehensive Internationalization in Higher Education could be developed and validated following Gehlbach and Brinkworth’s recommended steps for rubric development and validation. Utilizing a mixed-methods research design, 13 research participants evaluated and scored rubric cell descriptors over three survey rounds resulting in a rubric with a scale-level content validity index score ( S-CVI/Ave) of 0.920, well above the 0.80 acceptable minimum score. This mixed-methods rubric validation research study explains the process and results of a rubric developed for institutions interested in the comprehensive internationalization of their campuses and provides a scale to (a) conduct a baseline assessment; (b) develop a plan, establish goals, and align resources; and (c) track progress toward those goals over time.

The Team Role Test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test.

2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy V. Mumford ◽  
Chad H. Van Iddekinge ◽  
Frederick P. Morgeson ◽  
Michael A. Campion
Keyword(s):  
Test Development ◽  
Situational Judgment Test ◽  
Situational Judgment ◽  
Development And Validation

A Theoretical Framework for Mixed Methods Research with Canadian Families Living with Low Income

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Ginn ◽  
◽  
Karen Benzies ◽  
Leslie-Anne Keown ◽  
Shelley Raffin Bouchal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Theoretical Framework

Planning and Conducting a Large-Scale Mixed Methods Research Study: Research Team Experiences and Recommendations

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 283-295
Author(s):  
Katrin Niglas ◽  
◽  
Meril Ümarik ◽  
Maarja Tinn ◽  
Ivor Goodson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Research Team ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Study Research

Crowdsourcing Memories: Mixed Methods Research by Cultural Insiders-Epistemological Outsiders

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun Khanna ◽  
Karim R. Lakhani ◽  
Shubhangi Bhadada ◽  
Nabil Khan ◽  
Saba Kohli Davé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research

Change, Challenges, and Mixed Methods

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeasik Cho
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Evaluation Strategy ◽  
Validity Criteria ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
The Way

This chapter discusses three ongoing issues related to the evaluation of qualitative research. First, the chapter considers whether a set of evaluation criteria is either determinative or changeable. Due to the evolving nature of qualitative research, it is likely that the way in which qualitative research is evaluated can change—not all at once, but gradually. Second, qualitative research has been criticized by newly resurrected positivists whose definitions of scientific research and evaluation criteria are narrow. “Politics of evidence” and a recent big-tent evaluation strategy are examined. Last, this chapter analyzes how validity criteria of qualitative research are incorporated into the evaluation of mixed methods research. The elements of qualitative research seem to be fairly represented but are largely treated as trivial. A criterion, the fit of research questions to design, is identified as distinctive in the review guide of the Journal of Mixed Methods Research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document