Olmstead Update--November 2002: Serving People with Long-Term Care and Support Needs in Communities

2013 ◽  
Dementia ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 147130122110564
Author(s):  
Deborah Brooks ◽  
Elizabeth Beattie ◽  
Elaine Fielding ◽  
Katy Wyles ◽  
Helen Edwards

Background and objectives Many spousal caregivers experience stress, depression, loneliness, guilt and grief when placing a partner with dementia into long-term care. However, there is little research about their transitional support experiences, needs and preferences. This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of these issues from spousal caregiver and long-term care facility staff perspectives, to inform subsequent support and intervention development. Research design and methods Semi-structured interviews and small group discussions were held separately with spousal caregivers ( n = 9) and care facility staff ( n = 11). Criterion and variation sampling aimed to ensure a range of experiences and perspectives. The ‘Framework’ approach was utilised for data analysis. Interpretation was with respect to underpinning models of stress-grief process in dementia caregiving. Findings A range of informational, psychoeducational and psychosocial supports were identified to help spousal caregivers cope better with the stressors and losses experienced throughout the transition from home to long-term care. Improved education about disease progression, information relating to long-term care provision, peer support and dementia-specific grief counselling were deemed important. Opportunities for better support within care facilities were also identified. Support should be tailored to individual needs and preferences. Discussion and implications The findings suggest a supportive care framework be developed, encompassing the trajectory from assessment for and admission into long-term care to end-of-life and post-bereavement support. Spousal caregivers should have their support needs assessed by trained health or social care professionals and be offered a range of support options as appropriate.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Foster ◽  
Paul Henman ◽  
Jennifer Fleming ◽  
Cheryl Tilse ◽  
Rosamund Harrington

Internationally, over the past two decades the theme of personalisation has driven significant reforms within health and social care services. In the Australian context, the principles of ‘entitlement based on need’ and ‘personalisation’ frame the proposed National Disability Long-Term Care and Support Scheme (LTCSS). In this article, we critically examine the interpretations and ambiguities of need and personalisation. We consider the administrative complexities of applying these principles in practice and the uncertainties about the roles of state and the market, and use individual case examples to illustrate areas of potential tension. Whether principles translate to deliver personalised services and avoid harmful trade-offs between access, equity and choice is the true test of social policy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 673-677
Author(s):  
Ryo SATO ◽  
Yohei SAWAYA ◽  
Takahiro SHIBA ◽  
Tamaki HIROSE ◽  
Minami SATO ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 92-93
Author(s):  
Allan Beveridge

Depot Clinics or ‘Moderate Clinics’ tend to be similar. They are usually regarded as ‘low priority’ and often staffed by clinical assistants with only a limited training in psychiatry. Typically a large number of patients turn up each week, and there is little time for a detailed assessment of their needs. The clinic is often seen as ‘a chore’ by medical and nursing staff who may feel that the long-term care and support of patients with chronic disabling illnesses lacks excitement. One gains the impression that the patients with the less attractive personalities or those presenting repetitive management problems are more likely to be referred.


Author(s):  
Jose-Luis Fernandez ◽  
Julien Forder ◽  
Martin Knapp

This article considers the very different context of long-term care (LTC), where the care team often combines formal and informal workers. It focuses on the economics of LTC and in particular on issues such as the organizing and delivery of care and support to meet the significant future growth in demand for LTC. It discusses rapidly growing demand for LTC and resulting pressures on public finances. It means that governments across the globe are increasingly recognizing the need to get a better understanding of financing and allocating LTC resources, achieving individual and societal outcomes cost-effectively, and pursuing equity in the distribution of benefits and burdens. This article discusses provision, financing and governance, respectively and also mentions the consequences of aging populations on the need for and cost of LTC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document