<p><span><em>The research on adolescence perception to their reproduction </em><span><em>health guidance in Wirobrajan District, Yogyakarta could give an illustration </em><span><em>on a very well, well or poor perception guidance variables. Adolescence </em><span><em>reproduction health guiding function was to guide and to direct adolescence </em><span><em>in order to avoid from a disadvantageous behaviour for their future lives such </em><span><em>as free association, pre-marriage sexual intercourse, sexual affected disease, </em><span><em>drugs abuse, drinking, criminal acts and soon. Adolescence reproduction </em><span><em>health program was conducted through several approaches were among </em><span><em>others: Firstly, family communication approach i.e. a program given through </em><span><em>interpersonal communication between parents and their adolescence phase </em><span><em>and learning/ teaching approach, aimed to give adolescence reproduction </em><span><em>health program in school through intra-curricular and extra-curricular. </em><span><em>Secondly, a counselling approach meant that given to the adolescence and </em><span><em>their parents in a school guidance activity form as well as society through </em><span><em>social group/ organization such as youth workshop, Family Wellness </em><span><em>Program (PKK), BKR, and soon. </em></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><em>From the research result, it was known that adolescence perception to </em><em>reproduction health guidance was averagely good, except its perception </em><em>credibility was very good, adolescence concept or ways most liked on </em><em>adolescence health guidance was conducted a direct guidance using </em><em>demonstration tools. Viewed from an adolescence perception difference on </em><em>adolescence reproduction health guidance was based on sex, age, origin, </em><em>school, parent educational level and occupation. From the analysis result, </em><em>there was no respondent perception difference viewed from sex, age, origin, </em><em>school, parent educational level and occupation.</em></p>