The cost of homelessness: Assessing change over time

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Spano ◽  
P. Toro ◽  
M. Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
The Cost ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (4II) ◽  
pp. 517-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toseef Azid ◽  
Mumtaz Anwar ◽  
M. Junaid Khawaja

The embodied technical change should reduce the cost of production of the commodity. However, price structure, wages and interest rates also will change over time. Thus if a commodity is following a fixed price regime, the adjustment of a historical input-output table to current price wage level will leaves less and less profit per unit of output. The extent of this reduction will indicate the extent of technological change. There are different approaches to the prediction of changes in input-output coefficients. The first approach, attributable to Leontief (1941) and Stone (1962), assumes that input-output matrices change over time in a “biproportional” way. The other approach is to estimate trends in individual coefficients using statistical data. Former approach is used by a number of experts, including Fontela, et al. (1970), Almon, et al. (1974) and Carter (1970). Arrow and Hoffenberg (1959), Henry (1974), Savaldson (1970, 1976), Ozaki (1976), Aujac (1972) and Buzunov (1970). These are examples of the application of the quantitative approach for forecasting input-output coefficients. Still another approach which could not get much attention for forecasting input-output coefficients, is constructing the marginal input-output coefficients [Tilanus (1967); Middelhoek (1970)]. Marginal coefficients for forecasting constructed by Tilanus and Middelhoek are based on average input-output tables, which shows that still new approach (marginal) is based on the old (average) one


Author(s):  
Mariia Andriienko ◽  
Viktoriia Davydiuk

The article is devoted to the specification of areas and features of improving the classification of costs of the enterprise by elements, in order to successfully manage them. The study was considered on the example of both Ukrainian and Iraqi enterprises, as this classification differs slightly at these enterprises. But it is clarified that differences in the classification of costs by elements may exist not only for different countries, but also due to different opinions of scientists. Questions on production costs in various aspects were dealt with by such domestic and foreign scientists as: F. Butynets, V. Kozak, V. Lastovetsky, O. Moshkovskaya, M. Skrypnyk, O. Grishnova, A. Turilo, Y. Kravchuk and others. It has been found that the issue of classification of costs by elements has recently lost some popularity among Ukrainian economists. There is a fairly large number of criteria for classifying costs, which indicates the importance of information about this object in different views for management purposes. It is specified that the main factors of production (activity), ie the monetary expression of the expenditure of these factors, should be considered as the basis for the classification of costs by elements. The necessity of flexible change of classification of expenses on elements depending on evolution of change in quantity of the used factors and cost structure of expenses for their attraction is substantiated. It is proposed to divide the costs into constants and variables within each item according to the element classification. This logic of cost classification will clarify the cost structure, make it more convenient for management purposes (analysis, rationing, pricing, budgeting). It was found that the costs of the proposed elements will differ in terms of dominance of fixed or variable components. It is proposed in further explorations in this direction to clarify the possibilities of further classification of costs within each element. The generally approved forms of statistical reporting should change over time to describe more objectively what is happening at most enterprises in the country. However, the change of these forms will always be slower than required by the actual circumstances and changes in existing enterprises.


2021 ◽  
pp. 350-374
Author(s):  
Anjan Chakravartty

While much debate about scientific realism concerns the issue of whether it is compatible with theory change over time, and certain forms of selective realism have been suggested with this in mind, this chapter considers a closely related challenge for realism: that of articulating how a theory should be interpreted at any given time. In a crucial respect the challenges posed by diachronic and synchronic interpretation are the same; in both cases, realists face an apparent dilemma. The thinner their interpretations, the easier realism is to defend, but at the cost of more substantial commitment. The more substantial their interpretations, the more difficult they are to defend. The chapter looks at this worry in the context of the Standard Model of particle physics. Examining some selective realist attempts at interpretation, it argues that realism is, in fact, compatible with different commitments on the spectrum of thinner to more substantial, thus mitigating the dilemma.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Garbarini ◽  
Hung-Bin Sheu ◽  
Dana Weber

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Nordberg ◽  
Louis G. Castonguay ◽  
Benjamin Locke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document