The influence of temporal and spatial distance on moral judgment and decision making

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Agerstrom ◽  
Fredrik Bjorklund ◽  
Carl Martin Allwood
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Bartels ◽  
Christopher W. Bauman ◽  
Fiery A. Cushman ◽  
David A. Pizarro ◽  
A. Peter McGraw

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Gaesser ◽  
Zoe Fowler

Research in psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy has proposed a multifaceted view of human cognition and morality, establishing that inputs from multiple cognitive and affective processes such as theory of mind, semantic knowledge, and language guide moral judgment and decision-making. However, the extant perspective of moral cognition has largely overlooked a critical role for episodic representation. The ability to remember or imagine a specific moment in the past or future, supported by the medial temporal lobe subsystem, plays a broadly influential role in how people think, feel, and behave. Yet existing research has only just begun to explore the influence of episodic representation on moral judgment and decision-making. Here, we evaluate the theoretical connections between episodic representation and moral judgment, review emerging empirical work revealing how episodic representation affects moral judgment and decision-making, and conclude by highlighting gaps in the literature and future directions to explore. We argue that a comprehensive model of moral cognition will require including contributions of the episodic memory system, further delineating its direct influence on morality as well as better understanding how this system engages and interacts with other mental processes to fundamentally shape human morality.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Fowler ◽  
Brendan Gaesser

Research in psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy has proposed a multifaceted view of human cognition and morality, establishing that inputs from multiple cognitive and affective processes such as theory of mind, semantic knowledge, and language guide moral judgment and decision-making. However, the extant perspective of moral cognition has largely overlooked a critical role for episodic representation. The ability to remember or imagine a specific moment in the past or future, supported by the medial temporal lobe subsystem, plays a broadly influential role in how people think, feel, and behave. Yet existing research has only just begun to explore the influence of episodic representation on moral judgment and decision-making. Here, we evaluate the theoretical connections between episodic representation and moral judgment, review emerging empirical work revealing how episodic representation affects moral judgment and decision-making, and conclude by highlighting gaps in the literature and future directions to explore. We argue that a comprehensive model of moral cognition will require including contributions of the episodic memory system, further delineating its direct influence on morality as well as better understanding how this system engages and interacts with other mental processes to fundamentally shape human morality.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin M. Weisner

ABSTRACT This study reviews extant literature on construal level theory (CLT) of psychological distance (Liberman and Trope 1998; Trope and Liberman 2003). According to CLT, the concept of psychological distance constitutes a common meaning shared by four interrelated dimensions: temporal distance, social distance, spatial distance, and hypotheticality. The core premise is that psychological distance is tied to the level of mental construal (i.e., mental representation), such that more distant objects (or situations) are construed at a higher level and higher-level construals evoke thoughts of more distant objects (Trope and Liberman 2010). CLT further suggests that mental construals influence evaluation, prediction, and behavior (Trope, Liberman, and Wakslak 2007). In spite of the fact that CLT is considered a prominent contemporary theory and comprehensive framework for judgment and decision-making, behavioral accounting research, with few exceptions, has largely ignored the theory's predictions and insights. However, as accounting, auditing, and business in general become increasingly global and geographically dispersed, the perspectives provided by CLT should no longer be ignored. This study aims at illustrating CLT's potential for investigating hitherto unexplained phenomena within the accounting domain and argues that CLT provides the potential for a superior understanding of the heuristics and biases in judgment and decision-making that are associated with distance-affected decision environments. The paper reviews the findings reported in 88 articles (and one book chapter) with an emphasis on publications that apply CLT in contexts that are of particular interest to accounting researchers. CLT's underlying theoretical logic, its commonalities, and its differences with related theories and models are explained through a detailed review of the insights gained from basic CLT research. Commonly applied methods associated with experimental manipulations are highlighted, and broad, CLT-based research questions pertaining to various accounting domains are offered.


2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Tyszka ◽  
Tomasz Zaleskiewicz

The strength of emotions in moral judgment and decision-making under risk The focus of this paper is the role of emotions in judgments and choices associated with moral issues. Study 1 shows that depending on the strength of emotions when making a moral decision, people become sensitive to the severity and the probability of harm that their decisions can bring to others. A possible interpretation is that depending on the strength of emotions, people in their moral judgments choose to be either utilitarian or deontologist. In Study 2, following the priority heuristic model, we found that in situations in which the violation of moral norms does not evoke strong negative emotions, people are sensitive to quantitative risk parameters (probabilities and outcomes), and the decision-making process requires a relatively longer time. In moral situations in which a violation of the moral norm evokes strong emotions, decision-making is based on arguments other than quantitative risk parameters, and the process takes a shorter time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document