Adult Attachment, Coping, and Health Among Newly Married Couples

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlyn Daubs ◽  
Shelley A. Riggs ◽  
Megan D. Guinn ◽  
Carla N. Cook ◽  
Carly Heffel
Keyword(s):  
Adult Attachment ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Newly Married

Religious commitment, adult attachment, and marital adjustment in newly married couples.

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie L. Lopez ◽  
Shelley A. Riggs ◽  
Sara E. Pollard ◽  
Joshua N. Hook
Keyword(s):  
Adult Attachment ◽  
Marital Adjustment ◽  
Religious Commitment ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Newly Married

Marital Satisfaction and Relational Attachment in a Sample of Newly Married Couples

2004 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 989-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley D. Bowman ◽  
Geoffrey W. Sutton
Keyword(s):  
Marital Satisfaction ◽  
Marital Status ◽  
Adult Attachment ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Satisfaction Scale ◽  
Marital Enrichment ◽  
Current Stress ◽  
Newly Married ◽  
Relationship Assessment ◽  
Relational Attachment

The purpose was to investigate possible correlates [perception of parental marital satisfaction (Relationship Assessment Scale), marital status of parents, participation in marital enrichment, current stress, and sex] of marital satisfaction (Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale) and relational attachment (Revised Adult Attachment Scale). 71 young couples ( M age = 25.3 yr., SD = 3.2) in their first ten years of marriage completed the measures. Backward regression analysis indicated that marital status of parents, participation in marital enrichment, current stress, and sex accounted for a significant portion of the variance for the Anxiety subscale of the Revised Adult Attachment Scale. None of the models significantly accounted for the variance on the measure of marital satisfaction.

Attachment and physiological stress patterns in newly married couples

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula R. Pietromonaco ◽  
Casey J. DeBuse ◽  
Sally I. Powers
Keyword(s):  
Physiological Stress ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Newly Married ◽  
Stress Patterns

Forgiveness in Relation to Attachment Style and Consanguine Marriage in Iranian Married Individuals

2012 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahriar Shahidi ◽  
Behnaz Zaal ◽  
Mohammad Ali Mazaheri
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Attachment Style ◽  
Adult Attachment ◽  
Family Of Origin ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Family ◽  
Married Individuals

The aim of this study was to compare forgiveness in secure and insecure Iranian married couples. Whether marriage had occurred within the family (consanguine) or not (non-consanguine) was also considered. 400 married participants completed the Family Forgiveness Scale and the Adult Attachment Questionnaire. Analysis of reported forgiveness within the marital family showed that, although there was no significant difference between secure and insecure participants in overall forgiveness, secure participants rated “reparation” and “resolution” higher, whereas insecure participants rated “realization” and “recognition” higher. Comparing the experience of forgiveness in the family of origin, securely attached couples not only reported significantly more overall forgiveness but reported more “realization” and “resolution” while forgiving. Some interesting sex differences were also found, as individuals in consanguine vs non-consanguine couples differed in mean “recognition” in the forgiveness process.

scholarly journals Fecundability among newly married couples in agricultural villages in Palestine: a prospective study

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 2132-2138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Issa ◽  
M. Sallmen ◽  
K. Nijem ◽  
E. Bjertness ◽  
P. Kristensen
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Newly Married ◽  
A Prospective Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document