Psychophysiological Stress Reactivity: Menstrual Cycle Phase and Autonomic Perception Effects

Author(s):  
Karen Olson ◽  
M. Kathleen B. Lustyk
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen C. Olson ◽  
Haley A. Carroll ◽  
M. Kathleen B. Lustyk

While evidence suggests that women exhibit psychophysiological differences in stress reactivity across the menstrual cycle, the relationships among psychological and physiological stress reactivity states are not well understood. Healthy, normally cycling women (N=44) participated in two counterbalanced laboratory sessions during the follicular and luteal phases where heart rate and subjective stress were assessed in response to stressors. There were no differences in the magnitudes of psychophysiological stress responses across the cycle. Psychological and physiological states were largely unrelated in the follicular phase but interrelationships were found in the luteal phase and these relationships were influenced by autonomic perception and trait anxiety. For women with high trait anxiety, autonomic perception appeared to buffer psychological and physiological stress reactivity during the luteal phase, suggesting that autonomic perception may be a protective factor for more anxious women during times of acute stress.


1985 ◽  
Vol 249 (2) ◽  
pp. R186-R191 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Stephenson ◽  
M. A. Kolka

The changes occurring in the esophageal temperature (Tes) thresholds for initiation of heat loss responses as affected by the circadian period and menstrual cycle were studied. Four women exercised at 60% peak Vo2 in 35 degrees C (ambient water vapor pressure 1.73 kPa) for 30 min at 0400 and 1600 during the follicular (F) and luteal (L) phase. Tes, arm sweating rate (msw), and forearm blood flow (FBF) were measured frequently. At rest, Tes averaged 0.3 degrees C higher during L than F at both 0400 and 1600 and approximately 0.4 degrees C higher at 1600 than at 0400 during both phases. During exercise transients, the slopes of the FBF:Tes and the msw:Tes relationships were not different among treatments. The thresholds for initiation of sweating and cutaneous vasodilation were higher at 1600 than 0400 during both phases. Thresholds during F at 0400 averaged 36.44 degrees C for msw and 36.80 degrees C for vasodilation. The thresholds during L at 1600 averaged 37.46 and 37.53 degrees C for sweating and vasodilation, respectively. Our data indicate that the thermoregulatory effector activity during exercise is a function of numerous inputs, and one of these may be hormonal or hormonal-like in action. Controlling time of day and menstrual cycle phase are as important as controlling for aerobic power, age, and fitness in studying female thermoregulatory responses during exercise.


2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie K. Hoeger Bement ◽  
Rebecca L. Rasiarmos ◽  
John M. DiCapo ◽  
Audrey Lewis ◽  
Manda L. Keller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document