Monitoring performance with varying levels of task demand

1963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn R. Hawkes ◽  
Earl A. Alluisi ◽  
Thomas W. Meighan
Keyword(s):  
Task Demand ◽  
Monitoring Performance

Overload and automation-dependence in a multi-UAS simulation: Task demand and individual difference factors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinchao Lin ◽  
Gerald Matthews ◽  
Ryan W. Wohleber ◽  
Gregory J. Funke ◽  
Gloria L. Calhoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Difference ◽  
Task Demand ◽  
Simulation Task

Visual Display Format Affects the Ability of Anesthesiologists to Detect Acute Physiologic Changes: A Laboratory Study Employing a Clinical Display Simulator

1995 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 1184-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keerti Gurushanthaiah ◽  
Matthew B. Weinger ◽  
Carl E. Englund
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Study ◽  
Visual Display ◽  
Visual Displays ◽  
Display Format ◽  
Differential Effects ◽  
Monitoring Performance

Abstract Background Anesthesiologists use data presented on visual displays to monitor patients' physiologic status. Although studies in nonmedical fields have suggested differential effects on performance among display formats, few studies have examined the effect of display format on anesthesiologist monitoring performance.

The effects of cannabis and alcohol on simulated arterial driving: Influences of driving experience and task demand

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 859-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Lenné ◽  
Paul M. Dietze ◽  
Thomas J. Triggs ◽  
Susan Walmsley ◽  
Brendan Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Task Demand ◽  
Driving Experience ◽  
And Task

Sentence processing in language-impaired children under conditions of filtering and time compression

1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Stark ◽  
James W. Montgomery
Keyword(s):  
Sentence Processing ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Language Impaired ◽  
Monitoring Task ◽  
Time Compression ◽  
Lower Accuracy ◽  
On Line ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Monitoring Performance

ABSTRACTNineteen language-impaired (LI) and 20 language-normal (LN) children participated in an on-line word-monitoring task. Words were presented in lists and in sentences readily comprehended by younger children. The sentences were unaltered, tow-pass filtered, and time- compressed. Both groups had shorter mean response times (MRTs), but lower accuracy, for words in sentences than words in lists. The LI children had significantly longer MRTs under sentence conditions and lower accuracy overall than the LN children. Filtering had an adverse effect upon accuracy and MRT for both subject groups. Time compression did not, suggesting that the reduction in high-frequency information and the rate of presentation exert different effects. Subject differences in attention, as well as in linguistic competence and motor control, may have influenced word-monitoring performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document