Effect of a novel stimulus dimension on discrimination learning.

1968 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Richman ◽  
John Trinder
2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Rogers ◽  
T. C. Andrews ◽  
P. M. Grasby ◽  
D. J. Brooks ◽  
T. W. Robbins

Much evidence suggests that lesions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) produce marked impairments in the ability of subjects to shift cognitive set, as exemplified by performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). However, studies with humans and experimental primates have suggested that damage to different regions of PFC induce dissociable impairments in two forms of shift learning implicit in the WCST (that is, extradimensional (ED) shift learning and reversal shift learning), with similar deficits also being apparent after damage to basal ganglia structures, especially the caudate nucleus. In this study, we used the same visual discrimination learning paradigm over multidimensional stimuli, and the H215O positron emission tomography (PET) technique, to examine regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes associated with these subcomponent processes of the WCST. In three conditions, subjects were scanned while acquiring visual discriminations involving either (i) the same stimulus dimension as preceding discriminations (intradimensional (ID) shifts); (ii) different stimulus dimensions from previous discriminations (ED shifts) or (iii) reversed stimulus-reward contingencies (reversal shifts). Additionally, subjects were scanned while responding to already learnt discriminations (‘performance baseline’). ED shift learning, relative to ID shift learning, produced activations in prefrontal regions, including, left anterior PFC and right dorsolateral PFC (BA 10 and 9/46). By contrast, reversal learning, relative to ID shift learning, produced activations of the left caudate nucleus. Additionally, compared to reversal and ID shift learning, ED shift learning was associated with relative deactivations in occipito-temporal pathways (for example, BA 17 and 37). These results confirm that, in the context of visual discrimination learning over multidimensional stimuli, the control of an acquired attentional bias or 'set', and the control of previously acquired stimulus-reinforcement associations, activate distinct cortical and subcortical neural stations. Moreover, we propose that the PFC may contribute to the control of attentional-set by modulating attentional processes mediated by occipito-temporal pathways.


1974 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 1291-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick K. Ackles ◽  
Robert R. Zimmermann ◽  
Mark Manning ◽  
Charles Kazarian

30 young monkeys with discrimination learning experience and 30 first grade children were trained to discriminate stimulus pairs which differed in either brightness, volume, or volume plus brightness. After achieving the criteria of learning, Ss were tested for transposition on a fixed number of trials with stimulus pairs along the same dimension. The order of the near and far tests of transposition was counterbalanced. Both monkeys and children made the fewest errors in learning and transferring on the compound stimulus dimension. The most errors were made in learning and transfer on the brightness stimuli and on the far test condition. The analysis yielded no other significant sources of variance for children. However, the order of transposition testing, and the interactions of order × near-far test condition, stimulus dimension × near-far condition, and order × near-far × stimulus were significant sources of variance for the monkeys. Monkeys tested on the far test first made fewer errors on subsequent tests, and the magnitude of the reductions was most dramatic in the brightness condition. The results were interpreted in terms of stimulus differentiation in perceptual learning which assumes that relative differences among stimuli are valid sources of information.


1967 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles N. Uhl ◽  
B. Kent Parker ◽  
Philip B. Wooton

Rats were trained on a single-stimulus, successive discrimination in a free operant situation with continuous reinforcement of responding to S+. Ss were given 0, 4, or 8 days of overtraining (OT) after reaching the discrimination criterion. Half of the Ss were given a reversal shift (RS) and half a nonreversal shift (NRS). An irrelevant stimulus dimension was present at all times in Exp. 1, and it was absent in Exp. 2. OT did not affect RS or NRS learning in either experiment. NRS learning was faster than RS learning. These results were contrasted with other studies which have reported that OT facilitated RS learning and impeded NRS learning. Certain theoretical interpretations of discrimination learning, particularly Sutherland's treatment of centrally mediated attentional mechanisms, were critically discussed in light of the present findings.


1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-425
Author(s):  
Stuart I. Ritterman ◽  
Nancy C. Freeman

Thirty-two college students were required to learn the relevant dimension in each of two randomized lists of auditorily presented stimuli. The stimuli consisted of seven pairs of CV nonsense syllables differing by two relevant dimension units and from zero to seven irrelevant dimension units. Stimulus dimensions were determined according to Saporta’s units of difference. No significant differences in performance as a function of number of the irrelevant dimensions nor characteristics of the relevant dimension were observed.


1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1109-1110
Author(s):  
Deborah G. Kemler Nelson

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. James Kehoe ◽  
Kristin G. Boesenberg ◽  
Natasha White ◽  
Benjamin Carr ◽  
Gabrielle Weidemann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document