scholarly journals Data concerning the psychometric properties of the Behavioral Inhibition/Behavioral Activation Scales for the Portuguese population.

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 1117-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Moreira ◽  
Fernando Almeida ◽  
Marta Pinto ◽  
Pilar Segarra ◽  
Fernando Barbosa

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 101743
Author(s):  
Larissa T. Genaro ◽  
Paulo V.S. Ribeiro ◽  
Luana G. Mororó ◽  
Rogério Panizzutti ◽  
Linda Scoriels


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 448-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo P. P. Machado ◽  
Carla Martins ◽  
Ana R. Vaz ◽  
Eva Conceição ◽  
Ana Pinto Bastos ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Huang ◽  
Lina Ma ◽  
Wei Xia

The findings of existing studies of how role overload affects employees’ performance in organizations have been mixed and controversial. We draw on the hindrance–challenge framework to suggest that role overload contains both hindrance and challenge stressor components. We integrate this theory with the behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation systems (BIS and BAS) perspective to develop hypotheses about the effects of role overload on employees’ extra-role performance (voice). We suggest that although role overload is positively associated with withdrawal (a prototypical response of the BIS system) and ultimately negatively influences extra-role performance, it can also trigger job crafting (a prototypical response of the BAS system) and is, consequently, positively associated with extra-role performance. We further posit that the strength of these indirect effects is moderated by the quality of leader–member exchange (LMX). To support these hypotheses, we conducted a time-lagged study of 450 full-time pre-school teachers from various Chinese kindergartens. As hypothesized, we found that withdrawal and job crafting mediated the relationship between role overload and extra-role performance. Further, LMX strengthens the positive relationship between role overload and job crafting. Taken together, our results suggest that role overload can be a mixed stressor that activates both negative and positive behaviors, thus ultimately having an impact on extra-role performance.



2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela C. Gonçalves ◽  
Joana Martins Guedes ◽  
António M. Fonseca ◽  
Inácio Martín


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s809-s809
Author(s):  
S. Pimentel ◽  
M. Cunha ◽  
A. Galhardo ◽  
M. Couto

IntroductionThe dimensional approaches regard delusions as a continuum of the daily beliefs, not being limited to the clinical population and it can also be found in the general population. Due to the multifaceted conceptualization of delusions, the analysis of the dimensions of distress, preoccupation and conviction may be more revealing than the content of the belief itself, whereby an evaluation that incorporates these dimensions is fundamental.ObjectiveTranslation, adaptation and study of the psychometric properties of the Peters et al. delusions inventory (PDI-21) for the Portuguese population.AimAssessing the multidimensionality of the delusional ideation in the community.MethodsThe sample consists of 249 adults from the general population, aged between 18 to 65. The brief symptom inventory, the social desirability scale of the eysenck personality questionnaire and the World Health Organization quality of life–bref were used in this study beyond the PDI-21.ResultsThe Portuguese version of the PDI-21 has shown good psychometric properties regarding its internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It demonstrated significant positive correlations with the psychopathological symptoms and negative associations with social desirability and with the quality of life, confirming its divergent and convergent validity. The analysis of the frequency of delusional ideas for the total of the sample and on the basis of gender has revealed prevalence rates very similar to the ones found in previous studies.ConclusionsThe Portuguese version of the PDI-21 has adequate psychometric properties and it can be used to assess the delusional ideation in the general population.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.



2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Park ◽  
William Ickes ◽  
Rebecca L. Robinson

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to (1) to identify personality variables that reliably predict verbal rudeness ( i.e by replicating previous findings) and (2) to investigate what personality variables predict more general ugly confrontational behaviors. Design/methodology/approach – In Study 1, the authors used an online survey to collect information regarding individual differences in social desirability, self-esteem, narcissism, blirtatiousness, behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, conventional morality (CM), thin-skinned ego defensiveness (TSED), affect intensity for anger and frustration (AIAF), and verbal rudeness. In Study 2, the authors used a similar online survey to collect the same information, but extended the survey questionnaire to include measures of entitlement, psychopathology, Machiavellianism, and a retrospective checklist of ugly confrontational behaviors. Findings – In Study 1, regression analyses revealed that CM, behavioral inhibition, and behavioral activation reward responsiveness were significant negative predictors of rudeness. AIAF, TSED and behavioral activation drive were significant positive predictors of rudeness. In Study 2, regression analyses revealed that CM was again a significant negative predictor of rudeness. AIAF, and narcissism were significant positive predictors of rudeness. CM also negatively predicted ugly confrontational behaviors, whereas AIAF, blirtatiousness, and Machiavellianism were positive predictors. Originality/value – Although several measures of aggression exist, the current studies of rudeness and ugly confrontational behavior specifically assess tendencies to abuse strangers. These studies begin to establish a personality profile of the type of person that might abuse strangers.



2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip Raes ◽  
Dorien Hoes ◽  
Dinska Van Gucht ◽  
Jonathan W. Kanter ◽  
Dirk Hermans


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document